Compare MailSentry vs. White Ops FraudSensor

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MailSentry Logo
40 views|26 comparisons
White Ops FraudSensor Logo
244 views|98 comparisons
Ranking
Views
40
Comparisons
26
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
244
Comparisons
98
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
FraudSensor
Learn
Heimdal Security
White Ops
Overview

MailSentry is flawlessly paired with threat detection solutions in order to monitor your communications for false claims and malicious emails.

Business Email Compromise (BEC) attacks are on the rise, and for good reason. When successful, attackers easily walk away with staggering amounts of money. The global losses of US$ 26 billion reported by the FBI for up to July 2019 are only expected to grow.

Today’s bots can imitate human behavior like never before. Fraudsensor puts bots under the microscope of deep scrutiny by directly investigating each individual transaction, giving your organization unparalleled visibility into bot activity across your digital advertising or web application. And with a simple JavaScript implementation, you can be up and running in an afternoon.

Offer
Learn more about MailSentry
Learn more about White Ops FraudSensor
Sample Customers
Brother, Symbion, CPH WesttheTradeDesk
MailSentry is ranked 34th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while White Ops FraudSensor is ranked 21st in Fraud Detection and Prevention. MailSentry is rated 0.0, while White Ops FraudSensor is rated 0.0. On the other hand, MailSentry is most compared with , whereas White Ops FraudSensor is most compared with White Ops MediaGuard and PerimeterX Bot Defender.

See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.