We performed a comparison between ManageEngine IT360 and SCOM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The technical support is good."
"It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network."
"The product helps users stay on top of gaining insight into the active directory, permissions and security sets, and user group policy changes."
"This solution allows us to standardize all of the reports for monitoring the network, so it helps a lot for auditing purposes."
"It is very good at monitoring Microsoft Server."
"The stability has been great."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of Windows and Linux servers."
"It has good graphs of what is going on within the operating system."
"The solution is used for monitoring the hardware inventory. For instance, it helps with the whole operational monitoring view for the company's infrastructure."
"The most valuable feature is the extensibility, as there are really no limits as to what you can do with it."
"The most valuable feature of SCOM is the capability of using classes within your management pack development."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"We would like to have support for integration with ServiceDesk."
"The ManageEngine features could improve to show graphs of the traffic and network utility."
"The product could use more intelligence, automation and general availability of product information."
"There could be more integration of SIM in the solution."
"Regarding certain issues in the solution, it can be difficult to generate reports if we have a program that is not user-friendly for reporting. While this is not necessarily negative, we may need to use another solution."
"All of the areas of reporting are very bad and need to be improved."
"We didn't know the solution enough, and therefore, it took a while to set everything up correctly. There was a learning curve."
"The console feature is very poor, and it would be very good for us if this were improved."
"It would be a much better product if Microsoft provided management packs with the product."
"I would like to better be able to monitor Oracle processes."
"The price could be improved."
Earn 20 points
ManageEngine IT360 is ranked 90th in Network Monitoring Software while SCOM is ranked 11th in Network Monitoring Software with 77 reviews. ManageEngine IT360 is rated 8.4, while SCOM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ManageEngine IT360 writes "Good monitoring and alerting capability, and it is easy to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". ManageEngine IT360 is most compared with StackPath Monitoring, eG Enterprise and HPE OneView, whereas SCOM is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics and Nagios XI.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.