We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus and VMware Workspace ONE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."Microsoft Endpoint Manager is not expensive overall, especially for small environments."
"Stable solution at a good price."
"It's not working perfectly, but Microsoft's Autopilot offers great visibility into automated deployment solutions."
"The most valuable feature is probably mobile device management. Small businesses are coming under greater scrutiny and requirements for compliance as time goes on. We don't have to worry about a VPN because we can manage these devices, control company data, and lock users out. If needed, we can remotely wipe devices and deadman-switch them."
"I like how Microsoft Intune lets me lock down the email profile and make it accessible only on certain devices."
"We can manage and standardize security across your environment, identify problems, receive alerts, and so on. That's its purpose, and that's also why it's so good."
"Autopilot is the most valuable feature."
"Its protection policies are most valuable. It protects mobile devices as well as individual apps. It is pretty scalable, and its documentation is also pretty good. It is also pretty straightforward to deploy."
"Can manage a large fleet of devices without any outside interference."
"We've configured single sign-on for two or three enterprise customers, and it works very well."
"It was easy to use."
"It has all of the features that we need to use and that we want to use."
"It is like any other mobile solution. It gives us the ability to control remotely, and that is what we like. We can wipe out and deploy remotely."
"Workspace ONE has something like an orchestrator model that allows me to configure a set of steps to onboard new PCs, laptops, or tablets. So, it makes my work easy."
"The product offers integration capabilities with third-party solutions."
"We recently integrated Workspace ONE with our intelligence report, and this is a great tool from a reporting point of view. In our daily business, we get several requests from businesses to provide an Adobe request for monitoring, whether it is for Android or iOS devices. The main benefit of this tool is that we can exclude the report for applications."
"It seems highly stable and scalable."
"The installation is very easy. However, to be able to configure it you will need special knowledge, such as training or self-studies to have a proper level of security. There are many settings one has to understand before being able to implement Microsoft Intune."
"The policies we had in SCCM and AD offered features that are missing from Microsoft Intune."
"It would be great to see on-premises mailboxes and for the solution to have geofencing capabilities."
"I'd suggest adding more features for macOS in Intune. There should be more functionality for managing macOS. There should be a better capability for pushing things down on macOS. Currently, Intune is not capable of managing macOS at the same level as Windows."
"Microsoft Intune lacks the ability to provide seamless remote assistance or remote control."
"Enhancements for managing MacOS more comprehensively would be beneficial."
"I think that there is room for improvement with the reporting. If this is done, it will be a better product."
"I wanted to check if there is any provision at the Intune level to restrict certain things, such as a website, but unfortunately, that feature is available only in Microsoft Defender. Intune has web filtering capabilities, but they are only useful for protection from malicious websites, whereas we would like to be able to restrict a website. For example, YouTube is a clean website. No one would identify it as a malicious website, but if we want to stop the end-users from going to that website, we have to go for another product, such as Microsoft Defender or another third-party proxy solution. It would be great if this capability is included in Intune."
"Lacks a factory reset feature."
"Windows 10 management is there, but VMware only recently developed that part, and it's not fully mature. Patch management and other integrations are there as well as the application-pushing part, command line, mandatory commands, etc. Some out-of-the-box solutions should be available to better integrate a broader range of applications and handle application push. That's the roadmap we should look at."
"VMware Workspace ONE can improve in virtual reality. Customers are now looking toward virtual reality devices. Though it supports virtual reality, it's treated as an Android device. Customers want to deal with VR devices, they want a specific VR tool. Not an Android device VR tool."
"I prefer to work with Jamf Pro because it is more specific to working with the iPad features."
"The portal is not user-friendly."
"One thing VMware needs to improve is compatibility with different operating systems."
"The only downside to the solution is that the dashboard is very confusing."
"There is room for improvement in customer service and support."
"We'd like to see a better connection to Microsoft Azure and a better connection with Check Point."
ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is ranked 11th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 1 review while VMware Workspace ONE is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 81 reviews. ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is rated 10.0, while VMware Workspace ONE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus writes "Great features with very good function management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Workspace ONE writes "The solution is stable, scalable, and offers single sign-on". ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is most compared with ManageEngine Endpoint Central, IBM MaaS360, Google Endpoint Management and SOTI MobiControl, whereas VMware Workspace ONE is most compared with VMware Horizon, Jamf Pro, SOTI MobiControl, Citrix Workspace and ManageEngine Endpoint Central.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.