We performed a comparison between Citrix Endpoint Management and ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, ManageEngine and others in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management)."The feature I like the most is that we can perform remote tasks. If we want to retire or wipe out personal data or corporate data from a device, we can use Microsoft Intune remotely, and with the click of a button, data is removed automatically. Nothing needs to be done from the end-user side."
"There has been a noticeable increase in productivity for both my organization and clients."
"One of the main features of the solution is it allows the management of many devices in different ways."
"The synchronization of Intune with other Microsoft solutions is a valuable feature."
"We can securely manage both company-owned devices and personal devices enrolled in our BYOD program."
"The most valuable feature of Intune is the central dashboard for compliance and policy management."
"It's not working perfectly, but Microsoft's Autopilot offers great visibility into automated deployment solutions."
"The security-related tools are excellent; these features allow us to secure devices, lock them down, and ensure compliance."
"A valuable feature of Citrix Endpoint Management is that it's stable. The stability is not a challenge among the move to the cloud."
"ShareFile, in particular, is valuable with its ease of sharing, and the best category security that is in the hands of users."
"One key feature is secure application delivery, which enables the secure delivery of mobile and web applications to end-user devices. This ensures data protection and compliance with corporate policies."
"The MAM applications of the product are great."
"The product is capable of acting in many different ways to help secure architecture."
"We have seen improvements in compliance management on the devices."
"Can manage a large fleet of devices without any outside interference."
"The backend of Microsoft Intune needs to be improved. We have seen a little bit of delay as compared to other MDM solutions. That needs to be improved. A little bit more granularity should also be added"
"They need to integrate more with security options."
"We faced issues with macOS support. The product should have better inventory and asset management."
"Reporting could be improved. It needs to be more expensive and robust."
"There is room for improvement, particularly in terms of compatibility, extending beyond the well-known major brands."
"Microsoft Intune is not user-friendly to manage and has room for improvement."
"It should be simplified. I've worked with many different mobile device management solutions, and Intune is one of the more complex ones. It could be more simplified, and some of it is related to the wording that is being used, such as a configuration profile versus a policy. They really should have had different names to make it less confusing."
"The biggest problem we ever have is when something goes out of date after 30 days when nobody has logged into it. We do have a problem trying to get those back online. We've been working with Microsoft to resolve that problem, but that's been the only issue that we've had in the last few years."
"Support for inventory management of Apple devices should be added."
"Citrix often depends on other services like backend data centers, network security, and application firewalls. Issues in these areas can be misinterpreted as Citrix issues by users."
"Citrix needs to improve the architecture. They also need to strengthen the application integration. They keep referring to some things to be required as security, and they keep selling the next level and on-premise separately. They should give the customer the opportunity to decide whether they want to use the next level on-premise or on-cloud, but they should not charge additional fees if the customer wants to deploy the next level on-premise because the customer is already being charged as the end user. They should allow next level on-premise optimization without any additional charges."
"Requires integrating with ABM before enabling some of the features."
"The tool’s battery usage was high."
"Lacks a factory reset feature."
Citrix Endpoint Management is ranked 7th in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 10 reviews while ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is ranked 11th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 1 review. Citrix Endpoint Management is rated 8.2, while ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Citrix Endpoint Management writes "Offers flexible application management that allows secure delivery of applications to endpoints, enabling users to operate applications on the go". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus writes "Great features with very good function management". Citrix Endpoint Management is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, MOBI, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) and CyberArk Identity, whereas ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is most compared with ManageEngine Endpoint Central, IBM MaaS360, Google Endpoint Management, VMware Workspace ONE and SOTI MobiControl.
We monitor all UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
