Compare ManageEngine OpManager vs. Statseeker

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine OpManager vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Flexibility in the two view dashboard helps viewers and admins get the information they need about the fetwork in a flash.""The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to reach most of our network devices and get the most from them.""The most valuable feature is the network-related reporting.""The most valuable feature is the monitoring alerts. The administrators are immediately notified and can do the required action immediately. This is the feature we value and use the most.""It helps us a lot for monitoring our servers in one console, instead of going to individual servers.""The solution offers very good integration capabilities.""The application monitoring is the solution's most valuable feature.""The solution is easy to deploy. It's also easy to manage and monitor the environment. Instead of being reactive, it's proactive."

More ManageEngine OpManager Pros »

"The most important for us is how fast this solution is, as well as the granularity that you can get to, such as per-minute statistics.""We were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was.""The graphics and trends are the most valuable for us.""Being able to look back historically at the uptime and downtime is invaluable.""This solution allowed us to track down trouble users.""In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed.""Statseeker helps to quickly see if you have a spike or something going on. In the future, we need to get NetFlow in the tool so we can see what the IP is.""It also allows us to predict the capacity on WAN circuits, as well as other circuits, to help us plan for upgrading."

More Statseeker Pros »

Cons
"The two views into the system are very good but could be extended to further customization to fit the need of end users in a variety of roles.""The initial setup is a bit complicated. It needs a technician who is very aware of the flow and how to officially set up the flow chart, etc.""The dashboard has some limitations and should be more user-friendly.""The storage level monitoring needs improvement. It needs storage level monitoring on the server itself. That feature is lacking right now.""The licensing for this solution is not straightforward and should be improved.""The pricing of the solution is high. They should work to adjust the pricing model to see if they can help reduce costs.""The licensing model is confusing.""The solution is a bit difficult to configure. There are quite a number of configurations and plugins that you must handle early in the process."

More ManageEngine OpManager Cons »

"I'd say the interface could improve a little bit. I find with new users, I tend to have to spend a bit of time walking them through how to use the interface. It could be a little more user friendly.""Maybe they could provide a little bit more flexibility on creating custom dashboards.""I would like to have soft alarming. If an inner-base all of a sudden triggers a threshold, we have to rely on a lot of other tools and then we go into Statseeker to verify it. If Statseeker would confirm it preemptively and trigger it into our network panel, that would be nice.""We haven't seen an ROI.""I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API. Then I could produce a dashboard that my C level can understand. This is just so they can go and refresh whenever they want to and see what things look like.""With Statseeker I'd like to see some flow, i.e. what's tuning-up the network. The trend I like is managing the traffic load by going to the cloud.""The user interface needs to be made more intuitive.""This solution would be improved with better automatic discovery for ping-only devices."

More Statseeker Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance.""The licensing costs depend on the number of devices and accounts that are being monitored by the solution.""The initial cost is low and the add-ons are reasonable."

More ManageEngine OpManager Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance.""We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year.""It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is.""It's probably $5K a year for the license.""Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced.""We pay a yearly maintenance fee of approximately $40,000 USD.""The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500.""When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost."

More Statseeker Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Hi Rigoberto, We have recently introduced machine-learning enabled forecast reports for utilization and bandwidth usage forecasting.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
13th
Views
6,804
Comparisons
5,030
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
508
Avg. Rating
8.3
12th
Views
2,293
Comparisons
786
Reviews
26
Average Words per Review
466
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 55% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
OpManager
Learn
ManageEngine
Statseeker
Overview

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.
Offer
Learn more about ManageEngine OpManager
Learn more about Statseeker
Sample Customers
Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLCWith active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Non Tech Company42%
Financial Services Firm17%
Healthcare Company8%
Wholesaler/Distributor8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company28%
Healthcare Company5%
Media Company4%
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company31%
University14%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider15%
Media Company11%
Aerospace/Defense Firm9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise53%
REVIEWERS
Small Business3%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise83%
Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine OpManager vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ManageEngine OpManager is ranked 13th in Network Monitoring Software with 11 reviews while Statseeker is ranked 12th in Network Monitoring Software with 26 reviews. ManageEngine OpManager is rated 8.2, while Statseeker is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ManageEngine OpManager writes "The ability to better customize the views helps us target exactly what information gets to the people who need to know it". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Reduces the complexity of your network monitoring and is easy to use". ManageEngine OpManager is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, Nagios XI and SCOM, whereas Statseeker is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Zabbix, Nagios XI, PRTG Network Monitor and LogicMonitor. See our ManageEngine OpManager vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.