We performed a comparison between Delinea Secret Server and ManageEngine PAM360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The privileged access management module is the most reliable feature."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the random changing of passwords."
"The surveillance is most valuable."
"Support is helpful."
"Ease of use because of its monolithic software."
"I like that it is Windows-based. It is good that primarily, it is not an appliance. Some of the other applications in the space, such as a Quest Software CPAM or a Safeguard, are appliances, so you can't deploy the ends of them. With Thycotic, you can either install your Temporal Protection module physically in the VM host, or you can use BouncyCastle for high-security module capabilities."
"I really like the zero trust piece."
"The user interface is quite good. It's very straightforward."
"Deployment is very quick, and only a one-time installation process is required for ManageEngine PAM360."
"We can use it remotely as well."
"There are some things that I know are really important to include like A/B version features which are available in Windows. I would say that they should be included in the road map."
"I think that the main interface should integrate better with non-standard applications and clients, to connect with other systems."
"One thing that I wish they would do is to have a Kubernetes or container-based deployment supported, but they're not quite there yet. Containerization or support for containerization would be fantastic."
"This product is excellent in every way except minor details in handling extremely large environments."
"Installation can sometimes be difficult, depending on the environment."
"Support could be better. I have heard about a lot of problems in the Bangladesh market. People are saying that there are support issues. So, Delinea should focus on support and services."
"As I am partial to CyberArk, I rate Thycotic Password Reset Server as a nine out of ten, owing to the minor glitches I mentioned."
"Delinea Secret Server needs to improve its reporting."
"There could be improvement in latency and accessing resources for the product."
"If you want a cost effective solution and very competitive pricing, you should go with this product."
"I don't see any features associated with multi-factor authentication in ManageEngine PAM360."
"I would rate the scalability at five out of ten. It's average."
Delinea Secret Server is ranked 2nd in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 47 reviews while ManageEngine PAM360 is ranked 16th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 3 reviews. Delinea Secret Server is rated 8.2, while ManageEngine PAM360 is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Delinea Secret Server writes "Effective for password rotation policies triggered by audit requirements, it helps maintain compliance standards and seamless integration with third-party tools ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine PAM360 writes " An easy-to-deploy and affordable tool for access control monitoring". Delinea Secret Server is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, IBM Security Secret Server and BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, whereas ManageEngine PAM360 is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, ARCON Privileged Access Management, WALLIX Bastion, Fudo PAM and One Identity Safeguard. See our Delinea Secret Server vs. ManageEngine PAM360 report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
