"Along with its active directory infrastructure, this solution also possesses the ability to recover and exchange, making it a valuable backup tool."
"Ability to automatically detect and secure new data sources without requiring manual configuration intervention."
"The most valuable features of this solution were the features we worked most with which were telemetry, and the scheduler."
"Performs the backup properly and protects our data."
"The feature that was most valuable was that we could restore one mailbox and we could do different backups for different databases."
"The most valuable feature is the capability to back up our SQL server."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...The initial setup process for the solution is easy."
"I like that Micro Focus keeps a separate catalog of our data."
"Data Protector's granular recovery features make it easy for us to create and restore backups in an understandable and user-friendly manner. With granular recovery, any database or even just a database table can be restored at will."
"The solution has few features as it does not focus on managing anything in the application."
"The interface has been the same for many years and needs to be updated"
"They should design the solution so that it is much easier for deployment and make the UI easy to use."
"The GUI could be updated. The GUI hasn't changed since version 6. It's on version 10 now. The reporting could also be better. Also, while Data Protector is excellent for backing up physical hardware, it needs more features for backing up VM images because many environments use hypervisor."
"The graphical interface needs to be improved."
"The product can be developed by including functionalities like DR, CDP, and SureBackup, which are currently unavailable in the solution."
"Micro Focus Data Protector must improve its overall evolution record. They need to focus on hardware based instant recovery, client recovery, and cloud ability. Now there is no cloud ability."
"It's very expensive compared to Veeam and other similar solutions."
"The downside of the flexibility on offer is if you over-configure it, it may fail to function as some configurations may not match."
More ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is ranked 5th in Active Directory Recovery with 1 review while OpenText Data Protector is ranked 23rd in Backup and Recovery with 99 reviews. ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is rated 0.0, while OpenText Data Protector is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus writes "Though this tool lacks the features to allow backups on the same server, it is very easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Data Protector writes "User-friendly, competitive, agent-based, and easy to manage". ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is most compared with Semperis Active Directory Forest Recovery (ADFR), Veeam Backup & Replication, Quest Recovery Manager for Active Directory Disaster Recovery Edition , Rubrik and Quest On Demand Recovery, whereas OpenText Data Protector is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault Cloud, Veritas NetBackup, HPE StoreOnce and Symantec Data Loss Prevention.
We monitor all Active Directory Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
