Compare Mandrill vs. SendPulse

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Mandrill Logo
314 views|290 comparisons
SendPulse Logo
337 views|296 comparisons
Ranking
10th
out of 25 in Cloud Email
Views
314
Comparisons
290
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
9th
out of 25 in Cloud Email
Views
337
Comparisons
296
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
SendPulse
Video Not Available
Overview
Mandrill is a reliable, scalable, and secure delivery API for transactional emails from websites and applications. It's ideal for sending data-driven transactional emails, including targeted e-commerce and personalized one-to-one messages.

SendPulse is a fast, intuitive, and affordable way to send emails, sms, web push, and smtp email that will help you grow your business and increase brand awareness.

SendPulse provides:

  • Simple and intuitive interface to create campaigns and monitor your progress.

  • Ability to create emails in minute with hundreds of email templates and designs.

  • Emails optimized for all devices with no additional work.

  • Extensive reporting capabilities and AB test tools to help you get the best possible results.

  • 24 hour support on phone and test for any reason.

Offer
Learn more about Mandrill
Learn more about SendPulse
Sample Customers
SoundCloud, Envato, Trello
Polish Airlines LOT, Swatch, Karcher, Aeroflot, Radisson Hotels and Resorts

Mandrill is ranked 10th in Cloud Email while SendPulse is ranked 9th in Cloud Email. Mandrill is rated 0.0, while SendPulse is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Mandrill is most compared with MailChimp, SendinBlue and Amazon SES, whereas SendPulse is most compared with SendGrid, MailChimp, Mailjet and SendinBlue.

See our list of best Cloud Email vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Email reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.