• Home
  • MangoApps vs. Quip

MangoApps vs Quip comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MangoApps Logo

MangoApps

Read 2 MangoApps reviews
20 views|15 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Quip Logo

Quip

384 views|343 comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Intranet
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between MangoApps and Quip based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ShortPoint, Igloo and others in Enterprise Intranet.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Intranet Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
My recommendation for communication, filesharing, knowledge base management, and project management.
It's very refreshing to not have to maintain an intranet hosted in-house; it reduces pressure and overhead on IT while keeping company... Read more →
Use Quip?
Ranking
11th
out of 15 in Enterprise Intranet
Views
20
Comparisons
15
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
14th
out of 38 in Content Collaboration Platforms
Views
384
Comparisons
343
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Intranet
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ShortPoint, Igloo and others in Enterprise Intranet. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
MangoApps
Video Not Available
Quip
Video Not Available
Overview

MangoApps All-In-One allows clients to consolidate, eliminate cost & complexity of multiple tools and enables them to focus on delivering many use cases and application scenarios. It helps clients deliver a more purposeful workplace to employees, customers, and partners by positioning MangoApps as the workgrid to all existing enterprise applications.

Quip is a team collaboration solution which combines document and spreadsheet creation and editing with chat and commenting capabilities, to allow teams to communicate about tasks and projects directly while working on them.
Sample Customers
Redpath and Company, See's Candies, United Way of Greater St. Louis, Lubrizol Corp., UC Hastings College of the Law, EBSGateway, Coughlin Porter Lundeen, Giffels Webster, VaperMate, Western Entertainment Management, Enaya Insurance, North York Community House, TC Media, European Electronique, Modern Technology Solutions Inc., American Chemical Society Publications, Marcaria.com, ReachGlobal, agile360, Palmer Holland, Wunderman, EPMG, Shorelight Education
Fender, Twitch, Pinterest, Ultimate Software, New Relic, Facebook, Path, Larry Miller Companies, Kent Moore Cabinets, Taser, Zomato, Quora, Wealthfront, Benchmark, Greylock, Stripe, CNN, FiftyThree, Artivest, Trinity Valley School (edu), Delectable, Jack, NW stage, Average Joes Entertainment, Circa, Instacart, Mode Analytics, Clara, Assist, Remind, Airtable, Lean In, Famous, Al Jazeera,
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company14%
Manufacturing Company10%
Outsourcing Company10%
Financial Services Firm8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise52%
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Intranet
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ShortPoint, Igloo and others in Enterprise Intranet. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

MangoApps is ranked 11th in Enterprise Intranet while Quip is ranked 14th in Content Collaboration Platforms. MangoApps is rated 8.0, while Quip is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of MangoApps writes "My recommendation for communication, filesharing, knowledge base management, and project management". On the other hand, MangoApps is most compared with , whereas Quip is most compared with Amazon WorkDocs and Slack.

We monitor all Enterprise Intranet reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.