We performed a comparison between MarkLogic and MongoDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The rules can show us if there are missing items, like titles, and we can add them in to ensure everything is filled and makes sense and there are no missing details."
"MarkLogic's greatest asset is its strong engineering foundation. It was specifically designed with search capabilities in mind, and the developers placed a great emphasis on ensuring the quality of the indexing and all subsequent layers that were added."
"I found that MongoDB is most valuable for storing school-related queries. It's also user-friendly, and I found no difficulty accessing it. Setting it up is easy too."
"One of the most valuable features is the ability to Text Search can be used anywhere and anytime."
"It is convenient to use because we can do manipulations with the JSON data that we get. There are also a lot of joins and associations with MongoDB, which makes it easy to use for us."
"We find the query and speed very valuable."
"It is easy to set up."
"Easier to maintain the data with its document-based storage."
"In our case, it is most important to have redundancy."
"The most valuable feature of MongoDB is the ease of connections, aggregation, and queries."
"The spreadsheet capabilities could be improved."
"One of the most common requests is to improve the user interface of the database. While it is primarily a database, there are other databases available that offer more user-friendly interfaces. The UI is good for developers but not for regular users. More visuals would be beneficial."
"The solution can be a bit tough to set up if you don't have knowledge about how the database works."
"We'd like information about client onboarding experience and success stories. It would help to have something to show to internal stakeholders."
"It could be more stable. It would be better if it were more user-friendly like Oracle, which is very easy. For example, creating an index is simple in Oracle. In MongoDB, it's quite challenging to do that. Performance could be better. It's fast and good, but you cannot put every application that you would like to in MongoDB."
"Our program developer finds it to be a little unstable, development-wise."
"MongoDB would be improved with more integration, particularly for cloud environments like Google BigQuery."
"The performance can be improved."
"The performance could be faster."
"I suppose it could be a little more secure."
MarkLogic is ranked 9th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews while MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 68 reviews. MarkLogic is rated 9.6, while MongoDB is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of MarkLogic writes "Frequent updates, helpful search capabilities, and high quality support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". MarkLogic is most compared with Cassandra, whereas MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB and Oracle NoSQL. See our MarkLogic vs. MongoDB report.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.