Compare MATS vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

MATS is ranked 58th in Business Process Management while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 20th in Business Process Management with 3 reviews. MATS is rated 0, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "You can use all the features without worrying about making the system update patches, all of the issues are taken care of in the cloud version". MATS is most compared with , whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Pega BPM, Kofax TotalAgility and Camunda BPM.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda BPM Logo
30,533 views|19,718 comparisons
MATS Logo
72 views|30 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Signavio, camunda, Pega and others in Business Process Management. Updated: May 2020.
419,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
I use the open-source free version.Camunda is much cheaper.We are using the open-source version of this solution.It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range.

Read more »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
419,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
Learn
camunda
MatsSoft
Video Not Available
OpenText
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation

MATS is a new breed of "Low-code" BPM software that's quick to learn, easy to use and requires less IT. By using its drag-and-drop interface to configure, rather than code, you can build a new app faster than you can brief IT to do it for you.

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.
Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about MATS
Learn more about OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, AccruentITV, Thomas Cook, Mott MacDonald, Accord Mortgages, Nationwide, Roll Back Malaria, Coca Cola, FedEx, Intel, RBS, Vodafone, BarclaycardiTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Non Profit25%
Comms Service Provider13%
Construction Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company7%
Government6%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business47%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise35%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise76%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Signavio, camunda, Pega and others in Business Process Management. Updated: May 2020.
419,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.