McAfee Active Response vs. SanerNow Comparison

Sponsored
Cisco AMP for Endpoints Read 18 Cisco AMP for Endpoints reviews. 17,297 views\|12,265 comparisons	McAfee Active Response 53 views\|35 comparisons	SanerNow 120 views\|67 comparisons

Most Helpful Review

Korede Olatunji

Application Manager at Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Strong IDS solution, easy deployment, coverage across multiple platforms with at-a-glance dashboard and many more...

It has been effective as the primary AV tool. The visibility, dashboard and the navigations gives pretty decent insights into threats, IOCs and... Read more »

Use McAfee Active Response? Share your opinion.

Use SanerNow? Share your opinion.

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Cisco and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: January 2021.

Download now

455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable." More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »	Information Not Available	Information Not Available

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
What do you like most about Cisco AMP for Endpoints? Top Answer: The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features. Read all 9 answers What needs improvement with Cisco AMP for Endpoints? Top Answer: Nice to have URL management, password protection of the app, more details of the machine & user running the app. Read all 10 answers What is your primary use case for Cisco AMP for Endpoints? Top Answer: The primary use case is for endpoint protection. For the larger deployments, we use it for our policy enforcement as… more » Read all 7 answers	Ask a question Earn 20 points	Ask a question Earn 20 points
Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Defender Antivirus vs. Cisco AMP for Endpoints Compared 14% of the time. CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cisco AMP for Endpoints Compared 12% of the time. Carbon Black CB Defense vs. Cisco AMP for Endpoints Compared 9% of the time. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Cisco AMP for Endpoints Compared 7% of the time. Symantec End-user Endpoint Security vs. Cisco AMP for Endpoints Compared 7% of the time. See more Cisco AMP for Endpoints competitors » + Add more products to compare	McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response vs. McAfee Active Response Compared 100% of the time. See more McAfee Active Response competitors » + Add more products to compare	Kaspersky Endpoint Security vs. SanerNow Compared 100% of the time. See more SanerNow competitors » + Add more products to compare
Learn
Cisco	McAfee	Secpod Technologies Video Not Available
Overview
Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.	Continuous Visibility into Your Endpoints: Capture and monitor events, files, host flows, process objects, context, and system state changes that may be indicators of attack or dormant attack components. Identify and Remediate Breaches Faster: Access tools you need to quickly correct security issues. Send intelligence to analytics, operations, and forensic teams. Target Critical Threats: Get preconfigured and customizable actions when triggered, so you can target and eliminate threats.	SecPod’s SanerNow platform and tools provide a paradigm shift in endpoint security and systems management. SanerNow simplifies endpoint security, increases IT and security effectiveness, and reduces IT management cost. Platform specific tools provide vulnerability scanning, patching, compliance, asset, endpoint, and threat management. SanerNow provides one dashboard with one agent to address multiple high value business use cases.
Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints Learn More	Learn more about McAfee Active Response Learn More	Learn more about SanerNow Learn More
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial Bank	Liquor Control Board of Ontario	SACTECH, SACTECH, NEWBERRY GROUP, DIZZION
Top Industries
REVIEWERS Healthcare Company20% Government13% University7% Comms Service Provider7% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Comms Service Provider29% Computer Software Company23% Government6% Financial Services Firm4%	No Data Available	No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS Small Business36% Midsize Enterprise16% Large Enterprise48% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Small Business18% Midsize Enterprise21% Large Enterprise62%	No Data Available	No Data Available

McAfee Active Response is ranked 32nd in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) while SanerNow is ranked 30th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). McAfee Active Response is rated 0.0, while SanerNow is rated 0.0. On the other hand, McAfee Active Response is most compared with McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response, whereas SanerNow is most compared with Kaspersky Endpoint Security.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sponsored
Cisco AMP for Endpoints Read 18 Cisco AMP for Endpoints reviews. 17,297 views\|12,265 comparisons	McAfee Active Response 53 views\|35 comparisons	SanerNow 120 views\|67 comparisons

Compare McAfee Active Response vs. SanerNow