NetWitness Platform vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
NetWitness Logo
1,183 views|721 comparisons
74% willing to recommend
Trellix Logo
811 views|564 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NetWitness Platform and Trellix Advanced Threat Defense based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Datadog, Wazuh and others in Log Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Log Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It gives the capability for the incident response team to correlate logs to identify any kind of problem like malware and incidents in a general sense, both for logs and packets.""The packet capture aspect of it is a valuable feature because it is quite different from a traditional SIEM solution that only carries out investigations based on captured logs.""The most valuable features are the packet inspection and the automated incident response.""Possibility to investigate incidents based on logs and raw packets, such as extracting files sent over the network""It's quite economical compared to other solutions in the market.""The product's initial setup phase was not at all difficult.""NetWitness Platform is valuable for creating rules that the solution must detect.""The software is scalable to whatever is required, and you can also put a lot of resources in the cloud."

More NetWitness Platform Pros →

"It is stable and reliable.""Provides good exfiltration, and is an all-in-one product.""It stops in excess of twenty-five malware events per month, all of which could be critical to the business.""The most valuable features are the administration console and its detection and response module.""It is very scalable.""Its greatest strength is the DXL client which can rapidly disseminate attack information to all clients via the McAfee Agent instead of going through the ePO server.""I recommend this solution because of its ease of use."

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Pros →

Cons
"We have encountered issues with unresolved crashes.""Log aggregation is an issue with this solution because there are a huge number of alerts in a single instance.""The threat detection capability and centralizing and upgrading capability need to be improved. The threat alert capability needs to be improved as well because there is some lag time at present. They need to work on their database search too.""The initial setup is very complex and should be simplified.""The initial setup was complex because it takes a lot of time to complete the implementation.""Sometimes, it gives me static when integrating Windows-based systems. It should produce a precise log of sorts as to where the problem is. For example, a few days ago because of the McAfee application firewall, I couldn't get access to the particular Windows machine. So, my team and I had to figure out by ourselves that there was a virus responsible for the obstacle. This solution should trigger a meaningful log or message indicating the reason the user or implementer can't get into the machine.""The multi-tenant capabilities are lagging compared to IBM QRadar.""There is no support for this product in this country, so problems have to be resolved through global technical teams."

More NetWitness Platform Cons →

"There could be a tool that automatically updates all-new Microsoft IPs, which are available for free to connect to the client.""I would like to see future versions of the solution incorporate artificial intelligence technology.""We'd like them to be better at dealing with script threats.""Make the ATD system a part of the whole product and take the whole thing onto the cloud. While it is there already, it is not to the same level as the on-premise version.""Lacks remote capabilities not dependent on the internet.""This solution needs to be made "cloud ready".""The initial setup was industry standard complex. It takes awhile and has a lot of planning involved. It could be simplified with product redesign."

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It’s cheaper to run virtual machines in a VMware environment."
  • "The new pricing and licensing mechanisms are fair. I would advise always to get the full solution (i.e., not only Logs)."
  • "It is cheap."
  • "The licenses are good but the cost is very expensive."
  • "This is a pricey solution; it's not cheap."
  • "We have a perpetual license, so the total cost of ownership is not very expensive. It's a good investment."
  • "Many clients are not able to purchase the packet capability because there is a huge amount of data, and the cost depends on the number of EPS (Events per second), as well as the number of gigabytes of data per day."
  • "Our license is for one year."
  • More NetWitness Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The product is expensive, but it is better than the rest of them in the industry."
  • "Our licensing fees for this solution are approximately one million dollars per year."
  • More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Vinod Shankar
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase was not at all difficult.
    Top Answer:The product price was reasonable for my region and the market.
    Top Answer:From an improvement perspective, the NetWitness Platform needs to release new features and improve in areas like log correlation. The tool needs to have easier integrations with the cloud. Building a… more »
    Top Answer:The product offers good pricing. It was not very expensive.
    Top Answer:The scalability could be better. We'd like them to be better at dealing with script threats. In sandboxing, the time to respond is slower than we would like. We'd like them to be able to process… more »
    Ranking
    20th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    1,183
    Comparisons
    721
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    458
    Rating
    7.2
    Views
    811
    Comparisons
    564
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    548
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    RSA Security Analytics
    McAfee Advanced Threat Defense
    Learn More
    NetWitness
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    NetWitness Platform is an evolved SIEM and threat detection and response solution that functions as a single, unified platform for ALL your security data. It features an advanced analyst workbench for triaging alerts and incidents, and it orchestrates security operations programs end to end. In short: NetWitness Platform is all you need to run an intelligent SOC.

    Powerful advanced threat detection

    Uncover Hidden Threats

    Combine in-depth static code analysis, dynamic analysis (malware sandboxing), and machine learning to increase zero-day threat and ransomware detection.

    Threat Intelligence Sharing

    Immediately share threat intelligence across your entire infrastructure—including multi-vendor ecosystems—to reduce time from threat encounter to containment.

    Enable Investigation

    Validate threats and access critical indicators of compromise (IoCs) needed for investigation and threat hunting.

    Sample Customers
    Los Angeles World Airports, Reply
    The Radicati Group, Florida International University, MGM Resorts International, County Durham andDarlington NHS Foundation Trust
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider24%
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company24%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government10%
    Insurance Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company29%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Security Firm14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Government12%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Log Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Datadog, Wazuh and others in Log Management. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    NetWitness Platform is ranked 20th in Log Management with 36 reviews while Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is ranked 20th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 8 reviews. NetWitness Platform is rated 7.4, while Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of NetWitness Platform writes "Can find out if there is lateral movement, but integration and workflow need improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Advanced Threat Defense writes "Easy to set up and use with a nice interface". NetWitness Platform is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, RSA enVision, IBM Security QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel and Cisco Secure Network Analytics, whereas Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Trellix Network Detection and Response, Fortinet FortiSandbox and Microsoft Defender for Identity.

    We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.