We performed a comparison between SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."Although it is, in fact, a complete vulnerability management solution, the most valuable feature is the patch management functionality. Most of our customers give preference to this tool over other tools when it comes to patch management."
"We receive good protection with this solution."
"I think the costing is fine compared to other products. Cost-wise you definitely get value for your money."
"Tech support is responsive. They're good, the very best."
"The central management console is powerful. You can manage endpoints, DLP, encryption, and all the other features from a single console."
"I have found the most valuable features to be the ability to manage the solution from anywhere and having an overview of the companies security."
"I feel McAfee Endpoint Security to be a good, mature product."
"The new central console is better than the earlier one."
"Initially, the DLP was very valuable for disabling access to USB drives."
"SanerNow has good integration with the more well known ITSM tools, but at the same time there are many other ITSM (IT Service Management) tools available in the market, including local tools here in India, and I'm not sure how SanerNow plans to integrate with them all out of the box."
"I would like to have the ability to have more control over the deployment in the next release. If you have this console in the cloud, you cannot make pilot groups for deploying the agents. We only have the current group. So, as soon as you inject the software, it will go directly into production, which doesn't work for us. We need to build up pilot groups slowly. We already requested to have this feature on the cloud, and we are still waiting."
"With McAfee, if there is a zero-day vulnerability, you have to download the patch for it from the McAfee website, then apply it to your endpoint."
"Sometimes, while installing the ePO, we were getting so many errors and I don't know why it happened."
"The DAC (Dynamic Application Containment) component of this product needs improvement."
"Tech support is not as helpful as they were in the past."
"It can be quite complicated to learn McAfee Endpoint Security and to feel comfortable with the environment."
"Users can just install software into their computers. We need some sort of application control system that, if there are any pieces of software that are not whitelisted, then the solution could flag it or maybe alert the administers. That would be very helpful."
"McAfee GW Security and McAfee Child Safety need some improvement as they are relatively new."
More SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is ranked 19th in Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 12th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 94 reviews. SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is rated 10.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform writes "Advanced vulnerability Management solution with out-of-the-box integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, NinjaOne and BigFix, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.