We performed a comparison between Trellix Endpoint Security and Trend Micro Smart Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"This is stable and scalable."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"I think the costing is fine compared to other products. Cost-wise you definitely get value for your money."
"It's easy to use and it's very powerful. It offers nice endpoint protection."
"It has improved my organization because it helps with visibility, in terms of security. We can see the actual attack and can contain it. The antivirus can detect that."
"The solution includes a good combination of features for both signature and signature-less."
"This product has the capability to check a wide range of vulnerabilities and devices."
"It has been protecting us for many years, and we hope it will continue to do so for many years to come."
"When Intel acquired McAfee they worked on the protocol so that all vendors can work on the same platform. It's a very big improvement in McAfee. All McAfee products talk to each other. Other vendor's products can join this platform as well so it makes it more powerful on the enterprise side for McAfee."
"Dynamic Application Containment."
"The administration through the cloud is valuable."
"The most valuable features of the solution are ransomware protection, device control, and DLP."
"The configuration is easy."
"The antivirus signature is valuable."
"Smart Protection is great for monitoring traffic, particularly email, and protecting the endpoints. Both are valuable."
"We do get notifications, which are helpful."
"As a Japanese company, it doesn't have any restrictions on usage in our country."
"The most valuable features of Trend Micro Smart Protection are the email gateway and R & D which have contributed to their additional capability and development."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The support needs improvement."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"The solution is not stable."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"Tech support is not as helpful as they were in the past."
"We experienced some bad behavior when we first installed the product. The system also starts slowly in some instances. If for some reason this solution crashes, we could lose all our data."
"McAfee GW Security and McAfee Child Safety need some improvement as they are relatively new."
"It would be a lot easier if I could add multiple user accounts within a single device."
"The product is not easy to use."
"Currently, Trellix Endpoint Security can't find the running mutexes, while other open-source products can do it."
"It can be quite complicated to learn McAfee Endpoint Security and to feel comfortable with the environment."
"Signatures to protect against new attacks."
"Smart Protection could be more compatible with older operating systems like Windows XP and Windows 2000. Some of our clients have requested that."
"There are no data loss prevention features."
"The web filtering could be improved."
"Some functionalities within the DLP can be improved."
"It could be faster in responding to new threats like ransomware."
"The only notable concern is the level of support in the particular region of Sri Lanka. Following events in the past two years, the quality of technical support has regrettably declined."
"We were considering switching to SentinalOne because it has pre-detection, and Trend Micro does not offer this; it's something the solution should add."
"The solution should improve its mobile management solution."
Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 12th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 94 reviews while Trend Micro Smart Protection is ranked 31st in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 38 reviews. Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro Smart Protection is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Smart Protection writes "Offers strong, all-around cybersecurity but is expensive". Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Secure Endpoint, whereas Trend Micro Smart Protection is most compared with Trend Micro Apex One, Check Point Harmony Endpoint, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon and Fortinet FortiClient. See our Trellix Endpoint Security vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.