Compare McAfee Endpoint Security vs. Panda Security Adaptive Defense

McAfee Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 15 reviews while Panda Security Adaptive Defense is ranked 25th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 5 reviews. McAfee Endpoint Security is rated 7.8, while Panda Security Adaptive Defense is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of McAfee Endpoint Security writes "Enterprise endpoint security offerings are centrally managed and defend against the full threat spectrum from zero-day exploits to advanced targeted attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Panda Security Adaptive Defense writes "Simple enough to be used by a non technical specialist but it needs better threat intelligence ". McAfee Endpoint Security is most compared with Symantec End-user Endpoint Security, CrowdStrike Falcon and CylancePROTECT, whereas Panda Security Adaptive Defense is most compared with Microsoft Windows Defender, ESET Endpoint Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security. See our McAfee Endpoint Security vs. Panda Security Adaptive Defense report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee Endpoint Security vs. Panda Security Adaptive Defense and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
418,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
McAfee EndPoint Security has a lot of good features that work well if they are implemented properly.The solution is broken down into different components from the portals. Web filtering, which is an added feature has been great for us.When Intel acquired McAfee they worked on the protocol so that all vendors can work on the same platform. It's a very big improvement in McAfee. All McAfee products talk to each other. Other vendor's products can join this platform as well so it makes it more powerful on the enterprise side for McAfee.The initial setup is straightforward, not complex.The new central console is better than the earlier one.It has a very simple like multi-tenancy option and scalability is outstanding.McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection is stable. We don't have any bugs being reported.The most valuable features are the adaptive tech on McAfee.

Read more »

It's very easy to deploy, we don't have any problem or issues. It's most full automatic. It basically takes the assumption that everything is supposed to be a suspect; files, processes, URL accesses, and so on.The most valuable feature is the web filter application control.The patch management module is very important.Panda Security solution has a feature to block any unknown process and that is what is best about it.The feature I find most valuable is the advance search engine.

Read more »

Cons
I would like this solution to do what Palo Alto traps does because I would only need to run this one product.On the next release, they should build an easier way to see a repair option within the McAfee icon on your system tray. If there was an issue, you should be able to contact the user or just right-click on "repair". That would be a very good feature to add. That could be a place of improvement, just adding that button, or customizing it.The initial setup is complex. It is a very complex product. You must have experience with it.The solution could use better updates and fewer bugs.Sometimes, while installing the ePO, we were getting so many errors and I don't know why it happened.Support-wise they need to be better.When it runs in the background of the endpoint, the devices get slowed down for some applications.McAfee Endpoint Protection could improve the word control feature.

Read more »

The gap between the two final conclusions is a problem, whether or not a file is known to be malware or is known to be safe.The Linux installation is performed on the command line and they need a package installer for that operating system.Improvements could be made in terms of how the reporting is structured.They need to expand their offering of add-ons to enhance capabilities further.I would like to see better data protection.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It's fairly priced compared to other products on the market.This product is costly.The pricing is comparable to other solutions on the market.No comment.

Read more »

The licensing is subscription-based and priced well compared to other endpoint security solutions.The price of this solution depends on the number of licenses that you are purchasing.Panda is cloud-only and comes at a reasonable cost. It is a set price per seat.Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
418,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
14,552
Comparisons
12,522
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
396
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
3,913
Comparisons
2,997
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
594
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Total Protection for Endpoint, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, MCAFEE Complete Endpoint ProtectionPanda Security Adaptive Defense 360, Panda Security Endpoint Protection, Panda Security for Desktops
Learn
McAfee
Panda Security
Overview

McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection allows you to protect all of your devices with intelligent, collaborative security, in one easy-to-manage, integrated solution. Our integrated endpoint security framework helps remove redundancies, enables fast, proven performance and offers an architecture to align both current and future security investments. With a flexible choice of cloud-based or a local management console, security administrators also get true centralized management that simplifies ongoing tasks, deployment and monitoring.

Adaptive Defense 360 is a cyber-security service that combines next-generation protection (NG EPP) and detection and remediation technologies (EDR), with the ability to classify 100% of running processes.

Offer
Learn more about McAfee Endpoint Security
Learn more about Panda Security Adaptive Defense
Sample Customers
inHouseIT, Seagate TechnologyIndra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Government22%
Healthcare Company17%
Financial Services Firm17%
Retailer11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company40%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company6%
Manufacturing Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company37%
Comms Service Provider26%
Government8%
Media Company7%
Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee Endpoint Security vs. Panda Security Adaptive Defense and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
418,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.