We performed a comparison between Panda Adaptive Defense 360 and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The most valuable feature of Panda Security Adaptive Defense is we don't have to have dedicated infrastructure on-premise because it is cloud-based."
"The product so far has been good at protecting us. We haven't faced a breach."
"The dashboard management feature is valuable."
"Great technical support staff."
"It is stable, and the performance is good."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that I like the tool's UI, ease of management, ease of making reports, and the ability to export information easily."
"Adaptive Defense is pretty easy to use, and Panda support is excellent."
"I like the Panda Security Adaptive Defense cloud usages. Everything is on a single plane of glass like the dashboards. I also like the information I can get about the computers itself."
"The user behavioral analysis feature is great."
"The most valuable features are the adaptive tech on McAfee."
"We receive good protection with this solution."
"The initial setup of Trellix Endpoint Security was straightforward."
"This product has the capability to check a wide range of vulnerabilities and devices."
"The manageability of the product itself is its most valuable aspect. You have the underlying EPO, and on top of it, you can deploy the various components as you require. This is unlike other solutions like Symantec where you have to deploy everything or nothing. With this solution, you can choose to only deploy antivirus or only deploy a firewall, or only something else. I choose the components and that deployment is done through EPO. It makes manageability very flexible."
"The solution includes a good combination of features for both signature and signature-less."
"The product’s stability and security features enhance user protection and organizational security."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"The solution is not stable."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The support needs improvement."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"The implementation was difficult."
"t would help if it would monitor the network better."
"It needs some improvements in the DNS security feature. Currently, it does not have full DNS security. It only has semi-DNS security, which can be improved. It is an important feature for us, and it would be really good if they can improve the DNS security feature. Our group has some plans to change to Cisco AMP, which has features such as DNS, Umbrella. We are trying to learn about Cisco AMP and compare it with Panda."
"The gap between the two final conclusions is a problem, whether or not a file is known to be malware or is known to be safe."
"I'd like to integrate it into my main services."
"The Linux installation is performed on the command line and they need a package installer for that operating system."
"Improvements could be made in terms of how the reporting is structured."
"They need to expand their offering of add-ons to enhance capabilities further."
"The solution takes up a high amount of memory and can cause the system to hang."
"Its pricing needs to be improved."
"There is room to improve with scalability."
"The DAC (Dynamic Application Containment) component of this product needs improvement."
"Signatures to protect against new attacks."
"The solution's documentation is not streamlined and is in bits and pieces, which should be in a single format."
"The solution should provide a more easy way to uninstall it on specific stations."
"McAfee Endpoint Protection could improve the word control feature."
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is ranked 19th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 25 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 12th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 94 reviews. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is rated 8.2, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 writes "Managing multiple machines is a pain, but support is top notch". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Secure Endpoint. See our Panda Adaptive Defense 360 vs. Trellix Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.