Compare McAfee Endpoint Security vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee Endpoint Security vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers.""I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help.""For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.""The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.""The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.""The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.""I am really satisfied with the technical support.""It is a very stable program."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pros »

"It has improved my organization because it helps with visibility, in terms of security. We can see the actual attack and can contain it. The antivirus can detect that.""The loss prevention feature would be the most valuable.""Anyone can use it, the protection is good, and they have all of the features.""The most valuable features are the adaptive tech on McAfee.""McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection is stable. We don't have any bugs being reported.""It has a very simple like multi-tenancy option and scalability is outstanding.""The new central console is better than the earlier one.""The initial setup is straightforward, not complex."

More McAfee Endpoint Security Pros »

"The feature we found most valuable is the AI functionality for maintaining endpoint security. This is very powerful.""The most valuable features of the solution include the endpoint navigation protection, the protection related to the EMS service, as well as the control and the cloud integration capabilities.""It is excellent endpoint protection for mobiles that does everything it says it will.""We've not had any issues with scalability. If an organization needs to expand, they can do so quite easily.""Their policy management, their cloud-based dashboard and user interface are very easy to navigate.""The initial setup is not complex at all. It's very straightforward."

More Webroot Business Endpoint Protection Pros »

Cons
"We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released.""I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails.""The solution needs more in-depth analytics.""In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.""The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.""In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.""The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.""I would like more seamless integration."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Cons »

"The endpoint has room for improvement because it's restrictive, it's very sensitive. Sometimes it can delete something that you need and so sometimes you have to disable the antivirus.""We have a lot of problems with the user experience and it's difficult to implement. MacAfee's better than the ancient anti-virus solutions but it's a little slow to resolve. Many files with malware were destroyed through the network, and MacAfee doesn't detect anything.""Its pricing needs to be improved.""McAfee Endpoint Protection could improve the word control feature.""When it runs in the background of the endpoint, the devices get slowed down for some applications.""Support-wise they need to be better.""Sometimes, while installing the ePO, we were getting so many errors and I don't know why it happened.""The solution could use better updates and fewer bugs."

More McAfee Endpoint Security Cons »

"We need to know more details about how the virus interacted with the computer.""There needs to be more advanced analytics. It would make it a more powerful antivirus solution within the marketplace.""It would be nice if it had a feature for automatically generating reports on the client end for device status, security status and backup information.""Technical support is not the best. It's hard to get a hold of them if we need help. It's something that definitely needs improvement.""Webroot is very reactionary. It waits until the threat is active within memory to try and detect it. They need better pre-execution detection and prevention.""We need to have a stronger defense against CryptoLock and other attackers."

More Webroot Business Endpoint Protection Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It's fairly priced compared to other products on the market.""Pricing is reasonable and runs at a cost per user per year.""It is not that expensive. There is no additional cost. We got the entire bundle together.""The price of this product is good.""The price of McAfee is pretty similar to Symantec, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.""Its price is very high. It is higher than its competitors, and it should be less.""The pricing is great and licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."

More McAfee Endpoint Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user.""The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month.""The solution doesn't cost too much. It's about 30 Euros a year for each endpoint. It's pretty affordable for us and for many other companies."

More Webroot Business Endpoint Protection Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.
Top Answer: Nice to have URL management, password protection of the app, more details of the machine & user running the app.
Top Answer: The primary use case is for endpoint protection. For the larger deployments, we use it for our policy enforcement as… more »
Top Answer: McAfee EndPoint Security has a lot of good features that work well if they are implemented properly.
Top Answer: This solution is difficult to implement. There are lots of features but it has to be implemented the right way. I would… more »
Top Answer: This is part of our network security solution. We have it running on different servers and workstations that are on… more »
Top Answer: It is excellent endpoint protection for mobiles that does everything it says it will.
Top Answer: I think the one bad point about this product is that we did not find a way for Webroot to generate reports or schedule… more »
Top Answer: We are a small managed-service provider. One of the services we are providing to our clients is the endpoint protection… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Total Protection for Endpoint, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, MCAFEE Complete Endpoint ProtectionWebroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection
Learn
Cisco
McAfee
OpenText
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection allows you to protect all of your devices with intelligent, collaborative security, in one easy-to-manage, integrated solution. Our integrated endpoint security framework helps remove redundancies, enables fast, proven performance and offers an architecture to align both current and future security investments. With a flexible choice of cloud-based or a local management console, security administrators also get true centralized management that simplifies ongoing tasks, deployment and monitoring.

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection offers a unique security approach that protects against threats across numerous vectors; including email, web browsing, file attachments, hyperlinks, display ads, social media apps, and connected devices like USB drives, as well as other blended threats with the potential to deliver malicious payloads. SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection is fully cloud-based management, means no on-premises hardware or software is needed and the console is always up to date and there are no definitions or signatures to deploy and manage. Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection offers highly accurate and effective endpoint malware prevention with a range of additional security shield capabilities that keep both the user and the device safe, Malware detection occurs continuously in real time, so performance issues fade away.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about McAfee Endpoint Security
Learn more about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial BankinHouseIT, Seagate TechnologyMytech Partners
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
University7%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company23%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm4%
REVIEWERS
Government16%
Financial Services Firm16%
Healthcare Company12%
Computer Software Company12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider20%
Government7%
Manufacturing Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider25%
Computer Software Company24%
Construction Company4%
Wholesaler/Distributor4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise62%
REVIEWERS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise28%
Large Enterprise48%
REVIEWERS
Small Business89%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise6%
Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee Endpoint Security vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.

McAfee Endpoint Security is ranked 11th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 21 reviews while Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is ranked 21st in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 6 reviews. McAfee Endpoint Security is rated 7.8, while Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of McAfee Endpoint Security writes "Enterprise endpoint security offerings are centrally managed and defend against the full threat spectrum from zero-day exploits to advanced targeted attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection writes "Keeps mobile devices secure against vulnerabilities or any attacks". McAfee Endpoint Security is most compared with Symantec End-user Endpoint Security, McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Microsoft Defender Antivirus, CrowdStrike Falcon and CylancePROTECT, whereas Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender Antivirus, SentinelOne, Carbon Black CB Defense, Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra and Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection. See our McAfee Endpoint Security vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.