Compare McAfee MVISION ePO vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use McAfee MVISION ePO? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Critical Start, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: November 2020.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

"Their support is really good. I would rate it a nine out of ten. I have never any issues with their support. They always reply and follow our queries on time.""We implemented data transfer protection, which allows transfer in one direction only. Users can copy from the PC to the USB but not from the USB to the PC. That way, if someone is carrying a virus on a USB, it will not be transferred to the PC.""McAfee is helping us to clean all of the viruses from the machines, protecting our desktops from the latest threats.""If you set it up right, it can really manage a very complex environment which require fine tuning where there are a lot of exceptions. That's what it caters to. It can just do those specifics in those exceptional situations, which is good.""I really like the auditing component because it really looks at exactly what has happened on the network.""The most valuable features of this solution are the antivirus and the DLP.""The central manager policy means we have almost all client modules in one solution.""From a single dashboard, I can take a look at several things including the endpoint protection, the file integrity section, the data activity monitor, and more."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Pros »

"What I like the most is the ability to manage centrally, to manage the various devices, the platform, and the endpoint, all from one console."

More McAfee MVISION ePO Pros »

"There are some issues relating to the automation of reports. That's why I wanted the DLP reports. There are some problems in this area. Sometimes it does not work even though all the configuration words are right. There are also some problems with automatic updates.""It's a little bit complex to configure it, but when you start using it, it is much easier. There are many policies that you need to create, and in three or four places""McAfee should improve in terms of customer support and assigning a knowledgeable TAM to customers.""While there are bugs and a few functionality issues, it is just a matter of raising them with the support team. However, support is part of the problem as well. You want everything to be seamless in a perfect world, but the support is spread across different countries. They have Level 1, 2, and 3. Level 1 is most likely in a developing country. They don't provide the best service.""They have to do something to make the solution more resilient or recoverable from power failure events, which may include creating their own database.""The Virtual Patching feature needs to be improved.""The detection aspect should be improved so that signatures are updated more quickly.""There is a problem when it comes to agent communication and duplicate records, where the rebooting of a machine leads to the installation of a new agent and you get a lot of duplicate records that ultimately affect your compliance monitoring."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Cons »

"The rollout to cover the online resources, such as SharePoint, One Drive, and Office 365 doesn't seem to have a very clear path."

More McAfee MVISION ePO Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Compared to other Antivirus products, the cost of this solution is a bit high.""McAfee tries to package different things into different products, then sell them as different products with different licenses. They just split everything up into multiple things. That's just their sales pitch and how they do it.""This solution is priced in the mid-range."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice »

"For large enterprise companies, the price should be alright, but for small businesses, the uptake might be slow because, for these clients, the price doesn't look very attractive."

More McAfee MVISION ePO Pricing and Cost Advice »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The central management console is the solution's most valuable aspect.
Top Answer: The solution needs to be more clear about the licensing. They should have a way for users to educate themselves on the costs so that companies can figure out how to reduce costs. There needs to be… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
McAfee ePO, ePolicy Orchestrator, Intel Security ePolicy OrchestratorMcAfee MVISION ePolicy Orchestrator, MVISION ePO, MVISION ePolicy Orchestrator
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (McAfee ePO) is the most advanced, extensible, and scalable centralized security management software in the industry. Unifying security management through an open platform, McAfee ePO makes risk and compliance management simpler and more successful for organizations of all sizes.

Cloud-based Security Management
Remove the setup and maintenance of on-premises security management infrastructure, so you can focus on monitoring your endpoints and mobile devices.

Enforce Security from a Single View
Easy-to-follow panels and dashboards assess your security posture. Stay current with summaries of the latest threat information and advisories.

Streamline Operations, Minimize Risk
Automated and straightforward workflows drive security operational efficiencies. Optional workflow approval requires policy or tasks to be reviewed, assuring higher-quality results.

Learn more about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
Learn more about McAfee MVISION ePO
Sample Customers
Brelje & Race, Cognizant, Sutherland Global Services, Eagle Rock Energy, Arab National Bank, Bank Central Asia, Kleberg Bank, Leading Mexican Bank, SF Police Credit Union, Macquarie Telecom, Seagate Technology, Blackburn & Darwen Council, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, IRCEP, Major U.S. State Government, State of Alaska, State of Colorado, Cemex, Deutsche Edelstahlwerke
Information Not Available
Top Industries
Comms Service Provider27%
Recruiting/Hr Firm18%
Financial Services Firm18%
Computer Software Company45%
Comms Service Provider21%
Manufacturing Company5%
Financial Services Firm5%
Computer Software Company55%
Comms Service Provider19%
Manufacturing Company5%
Non Profit3%
Company Size
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise53%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Critical Start, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: November 2020.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is ranked 4th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 11 reviews while McAfee MVISION ePO is ranked 9th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 1 review. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is rated 8.2, while McAfee MVISION ePO is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator writes "Configure and deploy everything from a single web-based interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee MVISION ePO writes "Easy to set up and lets you centrally manage devices and endpoints from a single console". McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, whereas McAfee MVISION ePO is most compared with Splunk Phantom.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.