We performed a comparison between McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The AI capability is one of the main features of the solution because I believe that in the market, there are few solutions that are providing security solutions based on AI and machine learning."
"Sentinel pricing is good"
"We didn't have anything similar. So, it really provides value from the incidents and automation point of view. The overview of the security fabric is most valuable."
"Microsoft Sentinel comes preloaded with templates for teaching and analytics rules."
"It is always correlating to IOCs for normal attacks, using Azure-related resources. For example, if any illegitimate IP starts unusual activity on our Azure firewall, then it automatically generates an alarm for us."
"What is most useful, is that it has a good connection to the Microsoft ecosystem, and I think that's the key part."
"I've worked on most of the top SIEM solutions, and Sentinel has an edge in most areas. For example, it has built-in SOAR capabilities, allowing you to run playbooks automatically. Other vendors typically offer SOAR as a separate licensed solution or module, but you get it free with Sentinel. In-depth incident integration is available out of the box."
"The log analysis is excellent; it can predict what can or will happen regarding use patterns and vulnerabilities."
"The best part is management in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the central management console, which is used for DLP, endpoint security, drive encryption, and application control."
"The central manager policy means we have almost all client modules in one solution."
"The graphical interface of the solution is its most valuable aspect."
"It is a highly scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has a built-in advanced pattern, which is very useful because it can detect any pattern."
"Their support is really good. I would rate it a nine out of ten. I have never any issues with their support. They always reply and follow our queries on time."
"We get fewer false positives than with other solutions."
"None of the Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention features worked well, but the solution had a straightforward setup."
"There are no issues with the interface."
"The most values feature of this solution are the micro DLP features."
"We are able to check the log and keep records."
"It is a scalable product."
"The basic setup, like configuring servers or deploying the SaaS platform and agent implementation, is straightforward."
"We use Trend Micro mainly to monitor user activities, such as tracking the websites they visit and purchase items. Additionally, we focus on identifying and addressing antivirus threats. We used to explore a feature related to proxy but decided against it as an enterprise solution wasn't readily available for us. Our primary use of Trend Micro revolves around end-user security. Integration with Active Directory has proven beneficial, allowing us to easily push updates or changes directly from the console."
"The interface and dashboard are okay."
"Microsoft should improve Sentinel, considering that from the legacy systems, it cannot collect logs."
"Sentinel's reporting is complex and can be more user-friendly."
"It has been a challenge with Azure Sentinel to onboard the Syslog server from FortiGate. Azure Sentinel can work better on that shift between the Syslog server and a firewall."
"In terms of features I would like to see in future releases, I'm interested in a few more use cases around automation. I do believe a lot of automation is available, and more is in progress, but that would be my area of interest."
"We're satisfied with the comprehensiveness of the security protection. That said, we do have issues sometimes where there have been global outages and we need to raise a ticket with Microsoft."
"Sentinel should be improved with more connectors. At the moment, it only covers a few vendors. If I remember correctly, only 100 products are supported natively in Sentinel, although you can connect them with syslog. But Microsoft should increase the number of native connectors to get logs into Sentinel."
"They could use some kind of workbook. There is some limitation doing the editing and creating the workbook."
"We'd like to see more connectors."
"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator could improve by supporting container microservices, such as Docker and Kubernetes."
"Lacks a single plug-in for multiple uses."
"There needs to be support for Mac computers. Currently, McAfee does not work on iOS."
"The detection aspect should be improved so that signatures are updated more quickly."
"We need to consolidate multiple features into one console. It would be beneficial to have all the important features on a single platform."
"The solution is difficult to tune to avoid false positives."
"There are some issues we are having with updating our Windows server. So we need to contact support or access our support portal."
"One thing that I don't like is that McAfee products change very often and upgrade very often."
"The solution could use better logging in the future."
"Having more features apart from what the product was designed for is what I'd like to see in its next release."
"The tool should improve its reporting functionality. We need a proper reporting feature in a DLP solution."
"Typically, DLP solutions do not cover emails without an additional component, which necessitates a dual-service proposal. Comparatively, on-premises deployments offer more features locally than online or remote deployments, which sometimes face challenges with feature support. This is a common issue with Trend."
"Being able to specify an agent list, or client list, to allow support from outside of the organization, would be of benefit to this solution."
"It's hard for me to answer any questions about missing features. It's the outside companies who support us that manage this DLP solution at this moment."
"Trend Micro could be priced better, currently, it's a bit high. And there needs to be better after the sale, technical support."
"Most of the functions don't work in the way that they are supposed to."
More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is ranked 8th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 38 reviews while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is ranked 12th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 14 reviews. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is rated 6.2. The top reviewer of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator writes "Useful agent communication, reliable, but lacking support for microservices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention writes "Good for data blocking and security, content categorization, and generating accessibility reports ". McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is most compared with Splunk SOAR, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler Cloud DLP and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, whereas Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention, Amazon Macie and Trellix DLP. See our McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention report.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.