McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: March 2020).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The AI capability is one of the main features of the solution because I believe that in the market, there are few solutions that are providing security solutions based on AI and machine learning.""Sentinel pricing is good""We didn't have anything similar. So, it really provides value from the incidents and automation point of view. The overview of the security fabric is most valuable.""Microsoft Sentinel comes preloaded with templates for teaching and analytics rules.""It is always correlating to IOCs for normal attacks, using Azure-related resources. For example, if any illegitimate IP starts unusual activity on our Azure firewall, then it automatically generates an alarm for us.""What is most useful, is that it has a good connection to the Microsoft ecosystem, and I think that's the key part.""I've worked on most of the top SIEM solutions, and Sentinel has an edge in most areas. For example, it has built-in SOAR capabilities, allowing you to run playbooks automatically. Other vendors typically offer SOAR as a separate licensed solution or module, but you get it free with Sentinel. In-depth incident integration is available out of the box.""The log analysis is excellent; it can predict what can or will happen regarding use patterns and vulnerabilities."

More Microsoft Sentinel Pros →

"The best part is management in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator.""The most valuable feature of the solution is the central management console, which is used for DLP, endpoint security, drive encryption, and application control.""The central manager policy means we have almost all client modules in one solution.""The graphical interface of the solution is its most valuable aspect.""It is a highly scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has a built-in advanced pattern, which is very useful because it can detect any pattern.""Their support is really good. I would rate it a nine out of ten. I have never any issues with their support. They always reply and follow our queries on time.""We get fewer false positives than with other solutions."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Pros →

"None of the Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention features worked well, but the solution had a straightforward setup.""There are no issues with the interface.""The most values feature of this solution are the micro DLP features.""We are able to check the log and keep records.""It is a scalable product.""The basic setup, like configuring servers or deploying the SaaS platform and agent implementation, is straightforward.""We use Trend Micro mainly to monitor user activities, such as tracking the websites they visit and purchase items. Additionally, we focus on identifying and addressing antivirus threats. We used to explore a feature related to proxy but decided against it as an enterprise solution wasn't readily available for us. Our primary use of Trend Micro revolves around end-user security. Integration with Active Directory has proven beneficial, allowing us to easily push updates or changes directly from the console.""The interface and dashboard are okay."

More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Pros →

Cons
"Microsoft should improve Sentinel, considering that from the legacy systems, it cannot collect logs.""Sentinel's reporting is complex and can be more user-friendly.""It has been a challenge with Azure Sentinel to onboard the Syslog server from FortiGate. Azure Sentinel can work better on that shift between the Syslog server and a firewall.""In terms of features I would like to see in future releases, I'm interested in a few more use cases around automation. I do believe a lot of automation is available, and more is in progress, but that would be my area of interest.""We're satisfied with the comprehensiveness of the security protection. That said, we do have issues sometimes where there have been global outages and we need to raise a ticket with Microsoft.""Sentinel should be improved with more connectors. At the moment, it only covers a few vendors. If I remember correctly, only 100 products are supported natively in Sentinel, although you can connect them with syslog. But Microsoft should increase the number of native connectors to get logs into Sentinel.""They could use some kind of workbook. There is some limitation doing the editing and creating the workbook.""We'd like to see more connectors."

More Microsoft Sentinel Cons →

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator could improve by supporting container microservices, such as Docker and Kubernetes.""Lacks a single plug-in for multiple uses.""There needs to be support for Mac computers. Currently, McAfee does not work on iOS.""The detection aspect should be improved so that signatures are updated more quickly.""We need to consolidate multiple features into one console. It would be beneficial to have all the important features on a single platform.""The solution is difficult to tune to avoid false positives.""There are some issues we are having with updating our Windows server. So we need to contact support or access our support portal.""One thing that I don't like is that McAfee products change very often and upgrade very often."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Cons →

"The solution could use better logging in the future.""Having more features apart from what the product was designed for is what I'd like to see in its next release.""The tool should improve its reporting functionality. We need a proper reporting feature in a DLP solution.""Typically, DLP solutions do not cover emails without an additional component, which necessitates a dual-service proposal. Comparatively, on-premises deployments offer more features locally than online or remote deployments, which sometimes face challenges with feature support. This is a common issue with Trend.""Being able to specify an agent list, or client list, to allow support from outside of the organization, would be of benefit to this solution.""It's hard for me to answer any questions about missing features. It's the outside companies who support us that manage this DLP solution at this moment.""Trend Micro could be priced better, currently, it's a bit high. And there needs to be better after the sale, technical support.""Most of the functions don't work in the way that they are supposed to."

More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It comes with a Microsoft subscription which the customer has, so they don't have to invest somewhere else."
  • "It is a consumption-based license model. bands at 100, 200, 400 GB per day etc. Azure Sentinel Pricing | Microsoft Azure"
  • "Good monthly operational cost model for the detection and response outcomes delivered, M365 logs don't count toward the limits which is a good benefit."
  • "I have had mixed feedback. At one point, I heard a client say that it sometimes seems more expensive. Most of the clients are on Office 365 or M365, and they are forced to take Azure SIEM because of the integration."
  • "It is kind of like a sliding scale. There are different tiers of pricing that go from $100 per day up to $3,500 per day. So, it just kind of depends on how much data is being stored. There can be additional costs to the standard license other than the additional data. It just kind of depends on what other services you're spinning up in Azure, or if you're using something like Azure log analytics."
  • "I am just paying for the log space with Azure Sentinel. It costs us about $2,000 a month. Most of the logs are free. We are only paying money for Azure Firewall logs because email logs or Azure AD logs are free to use for us."
  • "Sentinel is a bit expensive. If you can figure a way of configuring it to meet your needs, then you can find a way around the cost."
  • "Azure Sentinel is very costly, or at least it appears to be very costly. The costs vary based on your ingestion and your retention charges."
  • More Microsoft Sentinel Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Compared to other Antivirus products, the cost of this solution is a bit high."
  • "McAfee tries to package different things into different products, then sell them as different products with different licenses. They just split everything up into multiple things. That's just their sales pitch and how they do it."
  • "This solution is priced in the mid-range."
  • "For large enterprise companies, the price should be alright, but for small businesses, the uptake might be slow because, for these clients, the price doesn't look very attractive."
  • "It is attractively priced. It is a fraction of what we're going to pay for CrowdStrike or SentinelOne, but it only has a fraction of the capabilities as well."
  • "There is a license required to use this solution. If we use the additional components, such as DLP encryption, there is an additional cost. However, it is similar to a separate product altogether. If you want to use that or not, it is optional, but when you use it, it will cost you additional pricing."
  • "McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is not an expensive solution."
  • "$The price of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is expensive, it is approximately $6,000 to $9,000 per license annually."
  • More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licensing and pricing of Trend Micro are comparatively low and competitive since they are offered in a bundle, especially compared to Symantec, which was has a relatively high price."
  • "It's relatively cheap so the pricing is okay."
  • "The client needs to pay for the Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention license on an annual basis."
  • "Price-wise, it is a cheap solution. I rate the solution's pricing a two on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high."
  • "Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is expensive compared to other solutions."
  • "I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."
  • "The product is worth the money you pay for it. It is not an expensive solution."
  • "It's not too expensive, especially when compared to SecureTech, and Forcepoint. It's actually cheaper. A license costs about INR 4,000 to INR 5,000, roughly $60 per license per year. In comparison, Forcepoint licenses are around $90 to $95."
  • More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Yes, Azure Sentinel is a SIEM on the Cloud. Multiple data sources can be uploaded and analyzed with Azure Sentinel and… more »
    Top Answer:It would really depend on (1) which logs you need to ingest and (2) what are your use cases Splunk is easy for… more »
    Top Answer:We like that Azure Sentinel does not require as much maintenance as legacy SIEMs that are on-premises. Azure Sentinel is… more »
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator network security… more »
    Top Answer:I like the solution's feasibility. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is also better and easier to use than other ePOs.
    Top Answer:I do not have exact pricing details, however, I would rate the price at a four out of ten overall. There may be some… more »
    Top Answer:The basic setup, like configuring servers or deploying the SaaS platform and agent implementation, is straightforward.
    Top Answer:It's not too expensive, especially when compared to SecureTech, and Forcepoint. It's actually cheaper. A license costs… more »
    Top Answer:Typically, DLP solutions do not cover emails without an additional component, which necessitates a dual-service… more »
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Azure Sentinel
    McAfee ePO, ePolicy Orchestrator, Intel Security ePolicy Orchestrator, McAfee MVISION ePO
    Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention
    Learn More
    Overview

    Microsoft Sentinel is a scalable, cloud-native, security information event management (SIEM) and security orchestration automated response (SOAR) solution that lets you see and stop threats before they cause harm. Microsoft Sentinel delivers intelligent security analytics and threat intelligence across the enterprise, providing a single solution for alert detection, threat visibility, proactive hunting, and threat response. Eliminate security infrastructure setup and maintenance, and elastically scale to meet your security needs—while reducing IT costs. With Microsoft Sentinel, you can:

    - Collect data at cloud scale—across all users, devices, applications, and infrastructure, both on-premises and in multiple clouds

    - Detect previously uncovered threats and minimize false positives using analytics and unparalleled threat intelligence from Microsoft

    - Investigate threats with AI and hunt suspicious activities at scale, tapping into decades of cybersecurity work at Microsoft

    - Respond to incidents rapidly with built-in orchestration and automation of common tasks

    To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

    McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (McAfee ePO) is the most advanced, extensible, and scalable centralized security management software in the industry. Unifying security management through an open platform, McAfee ePO makes risk and compliance management simpler and more successful for organizations of all sizes.

    Now more than ever, your data is on the move—whether it’s on a laptop, flash drive, or moving across physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures. At any point along the way, your financial data, customer information, intellectual property, or trade secrets could be lost or stolen. Securing this data is further complicated by several growing risk factors:

    Rapidly evolving compliance regulations and mandates, including GDPR
    Continued growth of workforce mobility
    Employees using their own mobile devices and consumer apps for work
    Rising frequency of advanced persistent threats (APTs) and data breach incidents

    To avoid the embarrassment, reputation damage, regulatory fines, and revenue loss, today’s enterprise must be able to identify, track, and secure all confidential data from multiple points within the organisation and in the cloud without impacting employee productivity and performance. In the past, many organisations tried traditional data loss prevention (DLP) solutions but found they were too intrusive, too complex to manage, and too costly to acquire, deploy, and maintain.

    Sample Customers
    Microsoft Sentinel is trusted by companies of all sizes including ABM, ASOS, Uniper, First West Credit Union, Avanade, and more.
    Brelje & Race, Cognizant, Sutherland Global Services, Eagle Rock Energy, Arab National Bank, Bank Central Asia, Kleberg Bank, Leading Mexican Bank, SF Police Credit Union, Macquarie Telecom, Seagate Technology, Blackburn & Darwen Council, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, IRCEP, Major U.S. State Government, State of Alaska, State of Colorado, Cemex, Deutsche Edelstahlwerke
    Excite Japan, MEDHOST, United Way of Greater Atlanta, University of Florida at Shands
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Insurance Company10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise20%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention
    March 2020
    Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is ranked 8th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 38 reviews while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is ranked 12th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 14 reviews. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is rated 6.2. The top reviewer of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator writes "Useful agent communication, reliable, but lacking support for microservices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention writes "Good for data blocking and security, content categorization, and generating accessibility reports ". McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is most compared with Splunk SOAR, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler Cloud DLP and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, whereas Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention, Amazon Macie and Trellix DLP. See our McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention report.

    We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.