McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] vs PhishLabs Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] and PhishLabs Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Threat Intelligence Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost is affordable and it also depends on the usage of the toolset."
  • More McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Threat Intelligence Platforms
    Views
    99
    Comparisons
    66
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Threat Intelligence Platforms
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    PhishLabs
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Based on activity from millions of sensors world-wide and an extensive research team, McAfee Labs publishes timely, relevant threat activity via McAfee Global Threat Intelligence (GTI). This always-on, cloud-based threat intelligence service enables accurate protection against known and fast-emerging threats by providing threat determination and contextual reputation metrics. McAfee GTI integrates directly with our security products, instantly protecting against emerging threats to reduce operational efforts and time between detection and containment.

    Digital Risk Protection
    Curated threat intelligence and complete mitigation in one solution, protecting critical digital assets and data from external threats across surface, dark, and deep web sources.​ Email Intelligence & Response A comprehensive solution that provides intelligence, mitigation, simulations and training for threats that bypass email security controls and reach user inboxes.

    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Media Company6%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise46%
    Buyer's Guide
    Threat Intelligence Platforms
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Threat Intelligence Platforms while PhishLabs Platform is ranked 40th in Threat Intelligence Platforms. McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] is rated 6.0, while PhishLabs Platform is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] writes "Informative dashboards and integrates well with other products, but it needs artificial intelligence for more advanced threat detection". On the other hand, McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] is most compared with , whereas PhishLabs Platform is most compared with ZeroFOX and Recorded Future.

    See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.