Saurabh BhattacharyaSenior System Engineer at a retailer
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"McAfee synchronizes security across the security fabric."
"The most valuable features are the integration with different modules like the DLP."
"It has a very good interface."
"The most valuable feature is the security, which is very effective compared to other products."
"The features that I have found most valuable are its ability to detect and delete known malware and the DLP in particular."
"The good part of this solution is that it protects the systems from malware etc. It also has a good user interface."
"It can be set up easily and then connected with the server to get the latest updates."
"The technical support is good. They are fast to respond and they have weekend support."
"It has reduced the number of people on the network team along with the system engineer involved in the security process. So, it is valuable."
"From a distributed firewall perspective, it's a solid solution."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to create, develop, and deploy servers in minutes to hours, rather than days."
"The most valuable features for us at this early stage are the interface and the integration with existing VMware solutions."
"The most valuable features are security and dynamic routing."
"This is the most scalable product of its type."
"From a security standpoint, the customer was able to better secure critical workloads while routing L2/L3 worked normally, giving them more confidence that they would be ready for any potential security incident mitigation or outage (DR)."
"The most valuable features are stability and low cost."
"They could try to introduce advanced threat detection."
"The advanced threat protection is not as good as our competitors."
"It's an expensive solution."
"The dashboard should be improved, as a more user-friendly version is required."
"They could improve the monitoring and classification of the data features."
"Sometimes, the updates don't happen successfully. The updates start, but they are not completed. Let's say there is a process that runs on the server-side every night, and it pushes the updates. Sometimes, these updates fail. I'm not sure whether it is a McAfee's problem or an internal problem with our systems. If this is really an issue with McAfee MOVE AntiVirus, McAfee can work on it and improve it in the next release. If it is an internal issue, I need to figure out why it is happening within the organization. We may need to take some technical support from McAfee to see what the problem is and then we need to get it fixed. At this point in time, all I know is that it happens sometimes."
"This solution is okay for users who are just office personnel. Developers or users who heavily use their laptops complain that it really slows down their laptops. Using this solution can be a big challenge from the performance perspective if you need a productive system that locally runs multiple VMs."
"I would like to see more emphasis on cybersecurity in the next release."
"We would to have a reverse proxy. This would add great value to the solution."
"We would like better integration with the standards on the market. For example, with OSPF, their integration in NSX is very low. It's not a full OSPF integration. It is too thin from a protocol perspective."
"It could be cheaper!"
"Everybody needs a network to connect to, and VMware doesn't readily provide one."
"I would like to see automation capabilities in the deployment process."
"The training costs a minimum of $3,000, which is expensive and should be reduced."
"Traffic flow introspection topology visibility is definitely needed because at the moment, NSX-T lacks in this area."
"There are always issues integrating with Cisco."
"The licensing fees are billed on an annual basis."
"The solution is not expensive."
"It could be cheaper, but anybody would like a good product at a lesser price."
"The solution requires a license."
"Pricing is reasonable."
"There is no monthly fee. You just purchase the tool."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"We can't go without NSX, so it's invaluable from this perspective."
"The solution is very expensive."
"The licensing fees are expensive and we pay on a yearly basis."
"It is an expensive product, but cheaper than some competing solutions."
"The price of this product is too high."
"This solution requires a licence."
"VMware NSX is expensive and everything is licensed. We have to pay for each individual feature."
"The price is based on the virtual desktop infrastructure(VDI) side and also is dependant on the size of the environment. The price is expensive and it could attract more purchasers in smaller organisations if it was reduced."
McAfee Management for Optimized Virtual Environments AntiVirus (McAfee MOVE AntiVirus) optimizes anti-malware protection for virtualized deployments, freeing hypervisor resources while ensuring up-to-date security scans are run according to policy.
McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is ranked 3rd in Anti-Malware Tools with 20 reviews while VMware NSX is ranked 1st in Network Virtualization with 19 reviews. McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is rated 8.2, while VMware NSX is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of McAfee MOVE AntiVirus writes "Detects and deletes known malware and the DLP". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware NSX writes "Allows for seamless micro-segmentation and the support is exceptional". McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Symantec Data Center Security, Symantec End-User Endpoint Security, Total Defense Anti-Virus and Cuckoo Sandbox, whereas VMware NSX is most compared with Cisco ACI, Nutanix Flow, Cisco Secure Workload, Guardicore Centra and Cisco SD-WAN. See our McAfee MOVE AntiVirus vs. VMware NSX report.
See our list of .
We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.