Compare McAfee MVISION Cloud vs. Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee MVISION Cloud vs. Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
534,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature for us is the DNS-based protection.""It analyzes the domain security helps us implement the securest policy.""The weekly reportings are great. The investigation is super and the application management is equally great.""It's very stable, reliable and does its job.""What we like most is security and how easy it is to integrate with other appliances.""Provides dependable DNS monitoring of external devices.""The initial setup is very easy and takes only a few minutes.""Helps block personal email accounts."

More Cisco Umbrella Pros »

"The support is excellent.""The other products that I have evaluated do not have the scalability options that McAfee has.""I found the solution to be stable.""The product has a very high rating from reviewers. It's a well-respected product.""In terms of their compatibility with major cloud providers, in terms of their abilities, capabilities, and features, they exceed everyone's capabilities in the CASB market.""It's an easy-to-use product.""Overall, the performance is good."

More McAfee MVISION Cloud Pros »

"It is for secure web trafficking, and it is doing what it needs to do. It allows customers to consolidate and eliminate multiple technologies onto Netskope and just kind of turn the dial and use more features, such as CASB, VPN. SWG is another feature. You can monitor and govern all the traffic.""We've found the solution to be quite stable.""One of the valuable features of the solution is that everything is on the cloud. It has no on-premise hardware to deal with."

More Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway Pros »

Cons
"This solution does not give us full, 360-degree protection.""I would like to see integration with SecurNX in the future.""The reporting could be improved by way of the information that's displayed. For example, when you pull a report, it shows an internal employee going to many websites, but you can spin that right down by saying a lot of it is being cached.""It has happened in the past that Cisco Umbrella has denied us access to secure websites.""In the next release, I would like to see the integration of VDI NSX with Cisco Umbrella.""They need to improve analytics so they report on more of the specifics of user activity.""Missing a real data leakage prevention solution.""Data reporting could be improved."

More Cisco Umbrella Cons »

"It needs to be more user-friendly, as it is a little bit complicated to use.""The solution is hard to configure, our team does not have specific training requirements for McAfee making it difficult.""There isn't really any aspect that is lacking.""One thing that can be improved is their ability to integrate with other web proxies to discover unsanctioned IP apps.""The pricing of the solution could be adjusted to make it more reasonable.""McAfee needs to add more products that could be managed from the cloud."

More McAfee MVISION Cloud Cons »

"Cost competitiveness is its area of improvement. They will have to figure out how can they strategically price it because there are a few players in the game who have been doing it for a long time. They will have to figure out how to go to market on the pricing.""The initial setup is a bit complex in that it takes a lot of time. In order to get the product to work as you need it to, there is a lot of configuration required.""The stability of the solution to be very good. It is not the best and could improve but it is better than other solutions, such as Forcepoint."

More Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"I am not sure, I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I think it's $1.00 or so per device/month.""Cisco uses subscription models for the pricing and there are three subscription plans.""The licensing part for Umbrella is really flexible.""There are three models for licensing with different feature sets.""I think it's worth the money.""The price of Cisco Umbrella is a little higher than similar solutions, like Gateway.""The price should be slightly lower than the current price because if you look at the whole solution, it is simply a threat intelligence solution to block blacklisted things. The price should be lower looking at the features provided by the solution. The price isn't too high either, but it could be lower.""There is a subscription cost."

More Cisco Umbrella Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This is an expensive product, but you have to compare that with other solutions that are on the market.""This is an expensive product, although it is made for larger enterprises and not for small organizations.""The price of the solution is good and we pay an annual license."

More McAfee MVISION Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We pay a licensing fee of $10,000 on a yearly basis."

More Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) solutions are best for your needs.
534,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:  Cisco Umbrella and Zscaler Internet Access are two broad-spectrum Internet security solutions that I have tried.… more »
Top Answer: I like that it integrates with the infrastructure. I also like the kind of data and intelligence that's built-in. It… more »
Top Answer: The price depends on the use case, and it's a bit linear. But it depends on the customer's strategy and how Cisco plans… more »
Top Answer: Overall, the performance is good.
Top Answer: The solution could improve the cost a bit. You do need to have a license in order to use the solution. I cannot speak to… more »
Top Answer: McAfee needs to add more products that could be managed from the cloud. At the moment, not all of their endpoint… more »
Top Answer: Netscope, Zscaler if they continue route they are on now. FIrewalls needs great deal of automation on each end… more »
Top Answer: Those firewalls that allow extend the perimeter. Nowadays, there is a issue with the static perimeter and all is going… more »
Top Answer: One of the valuable features of the solution is that everything is on the cloud. It has no on-premise hardware to deal… more »
Comparisons
Also Known As
OpenDNS
Skyhigh, MVision, MVISION Cloud, McAfee Skyhigh Security Cloud, Skyhigh Security Cloud
Learn More
Overview

OpenDNS provides easy-to-implement Internet navigation and Web security solutions for families, schools, governmental organizations and businesses of all sizes. The services provided by OpenDNS increase the speed of navigating websites and prevent unintended access to phishing and malware sites as well as to any Web content that you configure to be restricted.   

Skyhigh is the leading cloud access security broker (CASB) trusted by over 500 enterprises to securely enable over 16,000 cloud services, including shadow IT and sanctioned IT.

With Skyhigh, organizations leverage a single cross-cloud platform to gain visibility into cloud usage and risks, meet compliance requirements, enforce security policies, and detect and respond to potential threats.

Netskope’s Next Generation SWG is a cloud-based web security solution that prevents malware, detects advanced threats, filters by category, protects data, and controls app use for any user, location, device. It unifies our industry-leading CASB, SWG, and DLP into common policy controls with custom reporting and rich metadata for ad-hoc queries.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Umbrella
Learn more about McAfee MVISION Cloud
Learn more about Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway
Sample Customers
Chart Industries, City of Aspen, Eastern Mountain Sports, FLEXcon, George Washington University, Jackson Municipal Airport Authority, Ohio Public Library Information Network, PTC, Richland Community College, Smart Motors, Tulane University, VeriClaim
Western Union.Aetna.DirecTV.Adventist.Equinix.Perrigo.Goodyear.HP.Cargill.Sony.Bank of the West.Prudential.
Arrow, Cloudrise, Sainsbury, Evalueserve, Stroock, Apria, Ather Energy, CSA, AVX Corporation Nuna, City of San Diego Case, Genomic Health Case Study, Oak Hill Advisors, MaRS Discovery District.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm16%
Consumer Goods Company9%
Comms Service Provider9%
Security Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider28%
Computer Software Company25%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company21%
Transportation Company17%
Pharma/Biotech Company14%
Security Firm10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm8%
Insurance Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider17%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business39%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise34%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise63%
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise76%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee MVISION Cloud vs. Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
534,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

McAfee MVISION Cloud is ranked 8th in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) with 7 reviews while Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway is ranked 13th in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) with 3 reviews. McAfee MVISION Cloud is rated 8.2, while Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of McAfee MVISION Cloud writes "Excellent integration capabilities, good alerts, and very stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway writes "Scalable with good technical support and very good data leak prevention". McAfee MVISION Cloud is most compared with Netskope CASB, Microsoft Cloud App Security, Prisma SaaS by Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler Internet Access and Oracle CASB Cloud Service, whereas Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Menlo Security Secure Web Gateway, Fortinet FortiGate SWG, Cato Networks and Trustwave Secure Web Gateway. See our McAfee MVISION Cloud vs. Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway report.

See our list of best Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) vendors.

We monitor all Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.