We performed a comparison between Intercept X Endpoint and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"This is stable and scalable."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The most valuable features are the range and restriction."
"It is a practically maintenance free intelligent system that independently protects environments from malicious attacks."
"The solution is easy to install."
"Machine learning is used to detect the threat and it does so by prioritizing the suspicious activities."
"The thing that I like about it is the synchronized security. You can tie endpoint protection and firewalls and a whole range of other services and products. You can get your servers taken in under this."
"This solution can be used with any device, mobiles, desktops, or any appliances."
"The threat analysis center is nice."
"It is easy to change the size of its capabilities, i.e. to expand processes or scale the size of users."
"The technical support services are good."
"The extendability is great."
"The independent modules are very good."
"The installation phase of the solution was very easy."
"It is very valuable in finding out unknown malware."
"It's very stable and reliable."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"I have not received any complaints about the performance."
"The support needs improvement."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"Detections could be improved."
"I'm not clear on what features need improvement. Everything is mostly fine."
"There are not any solutions that are a 10 out of 10. A 10 would be perfect protection with no impact on the performance of the device. This is not the case, there is some impact on the performance of the device."
"The security is good but the feature set is limited."
"The tool should be made compatible with Linux and Microsoft operating systems."
"We've had difficulty with uninstalling the solution. When we try to uninstall an old version of the basic Sophos Antivirus, it doesn't seem to uninstall completely."
"The problem is that if you have a lot of different components going on, each managed under a different umbrella, then you're going to be spending a lot of time hopping back and forth between the different components to see, "Well, I got hit here. What did my firewall see? I got hit in the firewall, the firewall says it allowed that attack in, did it land on anything to compromise any of my endpoints?""
"We are not able to merge the sub-estates. If we create multiple sub-states and there may be instances where a user is in a different sub-state, it may not be possible for us to relocate that user from one sub-state to another through the console. We have to merge them manually which is not ideal."
"This solution is not in the high ratings on many of the top review sites. This solution has to be near the top for me to continue using it."
"The integration and display of the dashboards have to be done better."
"The performance could be better. I noticed that it slows down a bit."
"The initial setup can be a bit complicated for those unfamiliar with the product."
"There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better."
"They could also increase or improve the scalability because to my knowledge the biggest bandwidth can only support up to 10 gigs of input."
"From an improvement perspective, I want everything in the solution to be free."
"In some cases, the detection part was not accurate enough. We opened a few cases for the vendor to help us with some miscategorized findings on the endpoints. There were some false positive detections, and we had to work with the vendor to get them tested. We even had some incidents that were not detected. It was a black box type of solution for us."
"The price of McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Intercept X Endpoint is ranked 7th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 23 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 17th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 27 reviews. Intercept X Endpoint is rated 8.4, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Intercept X Endpoint writes "It can get ahead of the ransomware attack and encrypt the data on clients in the path of the infection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "Great ePolicy orchestrator, seamlessly expands, and offers good reliability". Intercept X Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Seqrite Endpoint Security, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint. See our Intercept X Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.
See our list of best EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) vendors and best EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) vendors.
We monitor all EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.