Compare McAfee MVISION ePO vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"What I like the most is the ability to manage centrally, to manage the various devices, the platform, and the endpoint, all from one console."

More McAfee MVISION ePO Pros »

"The most valuable features are simplicity and ease of integration.""The automation part and the playbook creation part are awesome. The way it is responding to the customers and incidents is also very good. In the SOC environment, I guess it will carry out around 50% of the work.""The pricing is very good.""The automation is excellent.""The most valuable features are the orchestration because of the way in which it coordinates the loss from all the devices and it provides us with a high-level overview of the critical log information.""The solution is very reliable."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pros »

Cons
"The rollout to cover the online resources, such as SharePoint, One Drive, and Office 365 doesn't seem to have a very clear path."

More McAfee MVISION ePO Cons »

"Implementing this solution requires a lot of involvement from the vendor and it should be made easier for the partners.""For building automation, there is not a lot of good documentation. The documentation is there, but it is not very good from my perspective. There should be an improvement in this area. I don't see issues with anything else. In terms of new features, I have heard that other products have EBA functionality. It would be good if this functionality could be added.""The user interface could be a bit better.""When Palo Alto bought the solution, the pricing increased by 1.5 times. There's been a 50% increase, which is a lot.""There should be an on-premise version available for customers to have different choices.""The solution is very expensive."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"For large enterprise companies, the price should be alright, but for small businesses, the uptake might be slow because, for these clients, the price doesn't look very attractive."

More McAfee MVISION ePO Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There is a perception that it is priced very high compared to other solutions.""From the cost perspective, I have heard that its price is a bit high as compared to other similar products.""There is a yearly license required for this solution and it is expensive."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
523,230 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: What I like the most is the ability to manage centrally, to manage the various devices, the platform, and the endpoint, all from one console.
Top Answer: For large enterprise companies, the price should be alright, but for small businesses, the uptake might be slow because, for these clients, the price doesn't look very attractive. So people will… more »
Top Answer: The rollout to cover the online resources, such as SharePoint, One Drive, and Office 365 doesn't seem to have a very clear path. There is a lot of different information all over the place and there's… more »
Top Answer: I think Swimlane is a better cost. It's small and doesn't focus on only integrating with it's own products like other XSoar competitors. 
Top Answer: I cannot speak to the exact cost of the solution or how much our organization pays. However, it is my understanding that the product is extremely expensive.
Ranking
Views
1,471
Comparisons
1,131
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
924
Rating
9.0
Views
10,682
Comparisons
8,432
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
447
Rating
8.3
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
McAfee MVISION ePolicy Orchestrator, MVISION ePO, MVISION ePolicy Orchestrator
Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
Learn More
Overview

Cloud-based Security Management
Remove the setup and maintenance of on-premises security management infrastructure, so you can focus on monitoring your endpoints and mobile devices.

Enforce Security from a Single View
Easy-to-follow panels and dashboards assess your security posture. Stay current with summaries of the latest threat information and advisories.

Streamline Operations, Minimize Risk
Automated and straightforward workflows drive security operational efficiencies. Optional workflow approval requires policy or tasks to be reviewed, assuring higher-quality results.

Demisto Enterprise delivers a complete solution that helps Tier-1 through Tier-3 analysts and SOC managers to optimize the entire incident life cycle while auto documenting and journaling all the evidence. More than 100+ integrations enable security orchestration workflows for incident management and other critical security operation tasks.

Offer
Learn more about McAfee MVISION ePO
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider17%
Manufacturing Company8%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise43%
Large Enterprise29%
Find out what your peers are saying about Critical Start, Splunk, Palo Alto Networks and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: July 2021.
523,230 professionals have used our research since 2012.

McAfee MVISION ePO is ranked 9th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 1 review while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 6 reviews. McAfee MVISION ePO is rated 9.0, while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of McAfee MVISION ePO writes "Easy to set up and lets you centrally manage devices and endpoints from a single console". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR writes "User-friendly and robust with good technical support". McAfee MVISION ePO is most compared with McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Splunk Phantom, whereas Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is most compared with Splunk Phantom, Fortinet FortiSOAR, IBM Resilient, ServiceNow Security Operations and Siemplify.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.