We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare McAfee MVISION ePO vs. Splunk Phantom

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
McAfee MVISION ePO Logo
2,005 views|1,544 comparisons
Splunk Phantom Logo
9,017 views|6,431 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"What I like the most is the ability to manage centrally, to manage the various devices, the platform, and the endpoint, all from one console."

More McAfee MVISION ePO Pros »

"Very flexible integration with other tools""So far, the interface is very easy to use.""I'm just a beginner on the solution and it's pretty easy for me to use.""The customization continues to be excellent.""I like the integration capabilities of Phantom. It has a lot of integrations with other products. Its searching methodologies are also good. It is also easy to understand and easy to create playbooks.""The most valuable feature is the risk-based access control."

More Splunk Phantom Pros »

Cons
"The rollout to cover the online resources, such as SharePoint, One Drive, and Office 365 doesn't seem to have a very clear path."

More McAfee MVISION ePO Cons »

"It would be ideal if we could automate processes even more.""We've had trouble implementing the solution with Microsoft products. There seems to be an integration gap.""I haven't used it fully, but based on my usage, I could not find simulation tools and features. It currently lacks simulation features, which are important for me for creating a playbook. It is also very expensive for my region.""And most of the challenges that I have faced with the solution can be found in the documentation itself.""In the beginning, we couldn't find any specific documents for every function. It wasn't easy to navigate to what we needed.""We want to see improvements made to the APIs such that we can connect to many different systems and data sources."

More Splunk Phantom Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"For large enterprise companies, the price should be alright, but for small businesses, the uptake might be slow because, for these clients, the price doesn't look very attractive."

More McAfee MVISION ePO Pricing and Cost Advice »

"I don't know the exact price, but for my region, it is very expensive."

More Splunk Phantom Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
555,139 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator network security software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mcafee's ePolicy… more »
Top Answer: I like the integration capabilities of Phantom. It has a lot of integrations with other products. Its searching methodologies are also good. It is also easy to understand and easy to create… more »
Top Answer: I don't know the exact price, but for my region, it is very expensive.
Top Answer: I haven't used it fully, but based on my usage, I could not find simulation tools and features. It currently lacks simulation features, which are important for me for creating a playbook. It is also… more »
Ranking
Views
2,005
Comparisons
1,544
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
924
Rating
9.0
Views
9,017
Comparisons
6,431
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
589
Rating
7.7
Comparisons
Also Known As
McAfee MVISION ePolicy Orchestrator, MVISION ePO, MVISION ePolicy Orchestrator
Phantom
Learn More
Overview

Cloud-based Security Management
Remove the setup and maintenance of on-premises security management infrastructure, so you can focus on monitoring your endpoints and mobile devices.

Enforce Security from a Single View
Easy-to-follow panels and dashboards assess your security posture. Stay current with summaries of the latest threat information and advisories.

Streamline Operations, Minimize Risk
Automated and straightforward workflows drive security operational efficiencies. Optional workflow approval requires policy or tasks to be reviewed, assuring higher-quality results.

Phantom enables teams to work smarter by executing automated actions across their security infrastructure in seconds, versus hours or more if performed manually. Teams can codify workflows into Phantom’s automated playbooks using the visual editor (no coding required) or the integrated Python development environment. By offloading these repetitive tasks, teams can focus their attention on making the most mission-critical decisions.
Orchestration
Phantom is the connective tissue that lets existing security tools work better together. By connecting and coordinating complex workflows across the SOC’s team and tools, Phantom ensures that each part of the SOC’s layered defense is actively participating in a unified defense strategy. Powerful abstraction allows teams to focus on what they need to accomplish, while the platform translates that into tool-specific actions.
Incident Response
Phantom helps security teams investigate and respond to threats faster. Using Phantom’s automated detection, investigation, and response capabilities, teams can execute response actions at machine speed, reduce malware dwell time and lower their overall mean time to resolve (MTTR). And now with Phantom on Splunk Mobile, analysts can use their mobile device to respond to security incidents while on-the-go. Phantom’s event and case management functionality can further streamline security operations. Case-related data and activity are easily accessible from one central repository. It’s easy to chat with other team members about an event or case, and assign events and tasks to the appropriate team member.

Offer
Learn more about McAfee MVISION ePO
Learn more about Splunk Phantom
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Recorded Future, Blackstone
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider16%
Manufacturing Company7%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government8%
Financial Services Firm7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Critical Start, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: November 2021.
555,139 professionals have used our research since 2012.

McAfee MVISION ePO is ranked 10th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 1 review while Splunk Phantom is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 6 reviews. McAfee MVISION ePO is rated 9.0, while Splunk Phantom is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of McAfee MVISION ePO writes "Easy to set up and lets you centrally manage devices and endpoints from a single console". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Phantom writes "Very stable with a straightforward setup and good performance". McAfee MVISION ePO is most compared with McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and IBM Resilient, whereas Splunk Phantom is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, IBM Resilient, Cisco SecureX and Swimlane.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.