McAfee NAC [EOL] vs Verizon Software Defined Perimeter comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between McAfee NAC [EOL] and Verizon Software Defined Perimeter based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC).
To learn more, read our detailed Network Access Control (NAC) Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Network Access Control (NAC)
24th
out of 34 in ZTNA as a Service
Views
118
Comparisons
102
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Network Access Control (NAC)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: March 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Intel Security NAC
Vidder, Verizon Vidder PrecisionAccess, Verizon PrecisionAccess, Vidder PrecisionAccess, PrecisionAccess, Verizon SDP
Learn More
McAfee
Video Not Available
Verizon
Video Not Available
Overview

McAfee Unified Secure Access is the world’s first network access control (NAC) solution to unify endpoint and network security with access control and policy auditing. Unlike many existing NAC solutions, McAfee’s integrated solution secures against threats inside and outside the network while remaining simple, cost-effective, accurate, scalable, and secure. It expands your security posture with Adaptive Policy Technology that combines multiple assessment and control features into one NAC solution. It controls access and protects against broad threats with application-based and identity-based technologies, which control who has access to your specific critical network resources. Furthermore, Unified Secure Access protects your investment by leveraging your existing network and system components and taking advantage of McAfee’s integrated management through McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO).

Vidder's PrecisionAccess screens both user and device to ensure they’re trusted before connecting them to protected applications — in three simple steps:

  1. Isolate the application so it’s invisible to everyone on the untrusted network.
  2. Verify user authenticity and authorization, and device trustworthiness.
  3. Connect the authorized user and trusted device to only the protected applications.
Sample Customers
State of Alaska
Comtrade
Buyer's Guide
Network Access Control (NAC)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: March 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

McAfee NAC [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Access Control (NAC) while Verizon Software Defined Perimeter is ranked 24th in ZTNA as a Service. McAfee NAC [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Verizon Software Defined Perimeter is rated 0.0. On the other hand, McAfee NAC [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Verizon Software Defined Perimeter is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine).

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.