We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Trellix Intrusion Prevention System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The application control and vulnerability protection are the most valuable features."
"You can scale the product."
"For those who want a next-gen firewall that's easy to configure and easy to operate, I think you should go for Palo Alto."
"The user interface is a bit more professional than some free products."
"It is a stable product."
"The initial setup was straightforward. It's quite easy. Deployment took one to two weeks."
"The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Threat Prevention for our company is the next generation firewall."
"It's very easy to use and configure. What is nice about Palo Alto is that even if you don't understand how to use it, you can just click on upload and upload everything that needs to be blocked."
"There's a good dashboard you can drill down into. It helps you easily locate intrusions and the source of attacks."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is a good product for dealing with DDoS attacks and for the inspection of network traffic."
"The most valuable features in Trellix for me are the automated signature updates. It is a great and convenient feature."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The product is worth the investment."
"Great monitoring feature."
"The most valuable features are the customization of the signature and the unlimited amount of signatures in IPS."
"McAfee NSP is much more stable than Cisco."
"I think they can use some improvement on FID."
"It's not so easy to set up a test environment, because it's not so easy to get the test license. The vendor only gives you 90 days for a test license; it's a tough license to get."
"We are attempting to improve the use of URL filtering beyond threat protection."
"The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower. In comparison with other solutions, I believe they're quite competitive."
"The application’s pricing and dashboard need improvement. It could be user-friendly."
"The technology firewall anomaly network could stand improvement."
"Mission learning techniques should continue to expand and detect unknown threats on the fly."
"In Africa, the technical support is probably not as good as in Europe and the USA because it's a specific premium support, partner-enabled premium support and all of that. But it's really good, I don't really have any complaints, it's fairly good. I'll give them 80%."
"The platform’s GUI could be the latest."
"The technical support must be improved."
"The management component could be simplified."
"Integration with Global Thereat Intelligence could be better. Also, I think management solutions are end of life now at McAfee. Network threat analyzer may be used for endpoint quarantines. Integration between these sides, as well as endpoint APO, will help you quarantine the risky endpoints."
"The solution needs to improve the graphical interface. And they had a limitation in some of the sensor modems as well."
"The area of concern where the tool needs improvement is how the product prompts users at a network level that helps prevent any wireless network attacks through alerts and notifications."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"The Network Security Managers could be more stable, agile, and work faster. When it comes to instability, there is room for improvement."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Pricing and Cost Advice →
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is ranked 6th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 24 reviews while Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is ranked 14th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 14 reviews. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is rated 8.8, while Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention writes "A good amount of granularity and advanced URL filtering capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System writes "Protects from attacks in real-time and provides accurate threat intelligence updates". Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is most compared with Check Point IPS, Fortinet FortiGate IPS, Arista NDR, Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall and Splunk User Behavior Analytics, whereas Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is most compared with Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Cisco NGIPS, Check Point IPS, Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall and Trend Micro Deep Discovery. See our Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System report.
See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
