Compare McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Microsoft Endpoint DLP

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Forcepoint, CoSoSys and others in Data Loss Prevention. Updated: June 2021.
512,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The administrative capabilities and the interface make this product accessible and easy to use.""The product provides us with an excellent, dependable solution to recommend to clients for their security needs.""The whitelisting works well.""The most valuable feature is the ability to control access to USB drives and other external devices.""The ability to block all USBs from the McAfee portal has been great.""The interface showcases threat incidents very well.""You can manage your compliance in line with legislation such as GDPR and POPIA."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Pros »

"The auto-labeling feature is definitely the most valuable feature. It goes in and labels the documents for you in different repositories. It covers the Outlook and Exchange repositories along with SharePoint and OneDrive. It is really helpful in those areas."

More Microsoft Endpoint DLP Pros »

Cons
"The pricing is high for licensing and support and the GUI interface is good but could use updating.""The product uses a lot of resources and because of this it is not always a good solution for every situation.""The solution needs an easier integration in heterogeneous and dynamic environments.""There needs to be support for blocking the sending of files by email because even if you block or remove an external disk, the files are not protected.""The solution needs to be a one-stop protection shop. And yet, the DLP isn't strong. Anyone can break it quite easily.""Technical support doesn't really offer fast response times.""Our client is not very happy with the lack of support, the skills, and the effectiveness of the tool."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Cons »

"There is a lot of ambiguity when you are setting up labels, such as sensitive information labels. It is a little daunting at first if you don't have prior knowledge, and there is a little bit of a learning curve for setting up the labels. Some of the setup wizards could be more helpful from an AI perspective. They can streamline the setup through more AI technologies so that you don't have to jump through so many hoops and different menus and dropdowns. It would be useful to have a setup wizard that is more hands-off and engaging for setting up the information type labels. If you tell them this is what we're trying to protect, it should basically start to lead you down that path of best practices. Such a feature would be great."

More Microsoft Endpoint DLP Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The pricing seems expensive both for the license and the support.""The price is high for this type of product.""If the client purchases the entire suite of McAfee Endpoint, the license is included."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It is a part of our Microsoft licensing. We pay for a yearly renewal. Its price is reasonable for the size of the organization we are. It is fairly competitive, and you get what you pay for. We have an E5 license, and a part of understanding the E5 license is to see what all you get with it. If you really look at it from that standpoint, you get a lot of value. You have Defender and all its security features in there as well. Their licensing is fairly flexible. They have different programs. We've seen ones where you could pay for up to three to five years in advance. There is also a monthly pay-as-you-go type of deal, but we're doing a yearly renewal and fixing the budget."

More Microsoft Endpoint DLP Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
512,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The interface showcases threat incidents very well.
Top Answer: Although I don't have too much information on the exact costs of the solution, it's my understanding that the pricing is pretty good.
Top Answer: We've had issues with the Lower and Upper filter of the device control module. Technical support doesn't really offer fast response times. They could continue to refine their defense on signature… more »
Top Answer: The auto-labeling feature is definitely the most valuable feature. It goes in and labels the documents for you in different repositories. It covers the Outlook and Exchange repositories along with… more »
Top Answer: It is a part of our Microsoft licensing. We pay for a yearly renewal. Its price is reasonable for the size of the organization we are. It is fairly competitive, and you get what you pay for. We have… more »
Top Answer: There is a lot of ambiguity when you are setting up labels, such as sensitive information labels. It is a little daunting at first if you don't have prior knowledge, and there is a little bit of a… more »
Ranking
6th
Views
709
Comparisons
505
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
746
Rating
6.8
9th
Views
288
Comparisons
218
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
890
Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
McAfee Total Protection for Data, McAfee Total Protection for DLP, Total Protection for Data, Intel Security Total Protection for Data
Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention, MS Endpoint DLP, MS Endpoint DLP, MS Endpoint DLP
Learn More
Overview
McAfee Total Protection for Data solution suite protects your data using a combination of powerful encryption, access control, and user-behavior monitoring.

At Microsoft, our mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Our mission is grounded in both the world in which we live and the future we strive to create. Today, we live in a mobile-first, cloud-first world, and the transformation we are driving across our businesses is designed to enable Microsoft and our customers to thrive in this world.

Offer
Learn more about McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention
Learn more about Microsoft Endpoint DLP
Sample Customers
Kleberg Bank
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm16%
Government11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider26%
Financial Services Firm7%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Forcepoint, CoSoSys and others in Data Loss Prevention. Updated: June 2021.
512,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is ranked 6th in Data Loss Prevention with 7 reviews while Microsoft Endpoint DLP is ranked 9th in Data Loss Prevention with 1 review. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is rated 6.8, while Microsoft Endpoint DLP is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention writes "Good whitelisting and stable on supported OS but doesn't protect against memory attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Endpoint DLP writes "Definitely the best in class with great stability, competitive price, support for different repositories, and very useful auto-labeling feature". McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is most compared with ESET Safetica, Microsoft BitLocker, Digital Guardian, Cisco AMP for Endpoints and McAfee Complete Data Protection, whereas Microsoft Endpoint DLP is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.