McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Aug 10, 2023

We compared McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention and Symantec Data Loss Prevention across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:

  • Ease of Deployment: McAfee Total Protection's initial setup can be either simple or challenging, with differing opinions. Users mentioned the importance of expertise and support, as well as potential difficulties with bandwidth and configuration. Symantec Data Loss Prevention's setup varies in complexity, with some users finding it more difficult than other options. 
  • Room for Improvement: McAfee Total Protection could enhance its AI capabilities, improve integration with other vendors, address IoT vulnerabilities, and incorporate GDPR regulations. Symantec Data Loss Prevention could simplify functions, bundle data protection with classification, and improve system resource management.
  • Pricing: McAfee Total Protection's pricing is considered high. Similarly, Symantec Data Loss Prevention also has a costly pricing system, requiring customers to pay a yearly licensing fee.
  • ROI: McAfee Total Protection has been highly rated for its ROI. Symantec Data Loss Prevention is praised for its effective data breach capture and collaboration features, along with providing cost savings.
  • Service and Support: McAfee Total Protection's customer service is considered satisfactory by some users, although they recommend the addition of 24/7 support. Symantec Data Loss Prevention receives mixed feedback regarding its support, as some users appreciate it while others encounter delays and slow response times.

Comparison Results: McAfee's setup process can vary in complexity, whereas Symantec offers more flexibility. McAfee provides a wide range of policies and user control, while Symantec excels in capturing and blocking data breaches. McAfee is generally considered expensive in terms of pricing, while Symantec's pricing is seen as high but fair. McAfee's customer support could be improved, while Symantec's support receives mixed feedback. McAfee prioritizes user-friendliness and data loss prevention, while Symantec focuses on effective breach capture and cost savings.

765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Offers some good protection features.""I am impressed with the tool's firewalls and web protection.""The most valuable feature is strong data leak prevention for data protection.""What I like about McAfee Total Protection is that it's working. I also like that it doesn't require any specific knowledge to set up.""The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal confidential information from endpoints.""The interface showcases threat incidents very well.""The product is largely stable.""The solution is very user-friendly and valuable."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Pros →

"An excellent solution for data classification.""The most valuable features of Symantec Data Loss Prevention are endpoint security, endpoint agent, and DLP. Additionally, we have been satisfied with the policies.""Symantec Data Loss Prevention is the number one product in its field. It does its job well and it has all the necessary features. It is definitely better than any other solution on the market.""There's only one policy needed to implement for all channels.""Technical support is very professional and responsive.""They have a feature on the management side called the document indexer. Let's say you have a unique document with many near identical versions, which have one or several values that change, while the rest of the content stays the same. You can collect 50 of those documents and put them into this feature of the Symantec DLP system. It will compress them and create a profile specifically for that document.""The product helps with blocking sensitive data transmission and permission management.""The most valuable aspect of Symantec DLP is its powerful policy system."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Pros →

Cons
"The pricing is high for licensing and support and the GUI interface is good but could use updating.""McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention could improve by making the customer aware of the benefits of the solution which would increase the adoption. Additionally, if there were features to suit multi-cloud environments it would be helpful. If the solution can intelligently identify which is important data for the organization and should not be released from the organization without authorization would be a benefit.""It could improve how it deals with solar data.""The initial setup is very complex.""Technical support doesn't really offer fast response times.""There needs to be support for blocking the sending of files by email because even if you block or remove an external disk, the files are not protected.""Our client is not very happy with the lack of support, the skills, and the effectiveness of the tool.""McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention could improve by having artificial intelligence."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Cons →

"We want a more proactive reporting structure.""The policies need to be improved.""What could be improved in Symantec Data Loss Prevention is its security. It should be more secure.""We need to have agent auto-parsing.""Different departments should manage administration, reporting, normalization and incident management.""In a majority of cases, most of the companies are using DLP for endpoint sessions, where you have a user that might be communicating information outside of the company. However, they forget there are actual interfaces that can directly communicate with either the database or other files within the data center that uses end-to-end encryption. In those cases, you might need things like your DLP to be able to monitor and block some of that. The solution needs to catch information communicated through the data center on the server-side.""The solution is not user-friendly.""It is very difficult to log in to create a support ticket because no one is available to support our queries."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing seems expensive both for the license and the support."
  • "The price is high for this type of product."
  • "If the client purchases the entire suite of McAfee Endpoint, the license is included."
  • "Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
  • "There is an annual license to use this solution."
  • "It's not a cheap option."
  • "I'm paying the license for McAfee Total Protection yearly. It could be cheaper, but it's fine."
  • "The price of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive. It is not the most expensive solution but it is typically 15 to 20 percent higher than other solutions. There is no additional cost to using McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention."
  • More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "If you are a small firm with less than 150 users, Symantec can be too pricey."
  • "From what I know the pricing is good, it's not too expensive. If you negotiate you can get a good price."
  • "The pricing and licensing are based on per user endpoints."
  • "The pricing is competitive and not pricey. We also receive corporate discounts."
  • "We are happy with the pricing and licencing."
  • "In terms of pricing, Symantec DLP works with Oracle Database. Oracle Database licensing is much more expensive than other databases. That might be a drawback for customers. The pricing is on a yearly subscription basis."
  • "Pricing is reasonable."
  • "The pricing is reasonable."
  • More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal confidential information from endpoints.
    Top Answer:McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive.
    Top Answer:All of the features are really important, including DLP for the OCR and endpoint. It will be all of the combined features that will give you the strength to control the data. Every feature has its own… more »
    Top Answer:Their support program needs a lot of improvement. If you are stuck somewhere, getting their support can be difficult. Adding the feature of control over Bluetooth is very important right now, most… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,162
    Comparisons
    678
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    342
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    5,721
    Comparisons
    3,671
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    586
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    McAfee Total Protection for Data, McAfee Total Protection for DLP, Total Protection for Data, Intel Security Total Protection for Data
    Symantec DLP
    Learn More
    Overview
    McAfee Total Protection for Data solution suite protects your data using a combination of powerful encryption, access control, and user-behavior monitoring.

    Keeping sensitive corporate information safe and compliant has never been easy. But today, you’re faced with a totally new set of data protection challenges. Sensitive information is leaving the safety of your corporate network as more employees share files over consumer cloud storage services and access those files on their own mobile devices. The number of targeted cyber attacks continues to grow, as cybercriminals develop effective new methods for defeating traditional security measures and stealing corporate information. And as all of these factors converge, it becomes increasingly difficult to manage corporate information and protect it against loss and theft. 

    Symantec Data Loss Prevention (DLP) provides a comprehensive approach to information protection that embraces today’s cloud- and mobile-centered realities. With DLP, you can:

    • Discover where data is stored across all of your cloud, mobile, network, endpoint, and storage systems

    • Monitor how data is being used, whether your employees are on or off the network

    • Protect data from being leaked or stolen—no matter where it’s stored or how it’s used

    Sample Customers
    Kleberg Bank
    Hadassah University Hospital, Her Majestys Government (HMG), United Kingdom, Hitachi Consulting Software Services India Pvt Ltd., Hua Nan Bank, Hyundai Department Store Group,JW Marriott Hotel Seoul, Lake Health, McCann Erickson Israel, Molina Healthcare Inc., PGi, Quilvest Switzerland Limited, State of Nevada Public Employees Benefits Program, Symantec Corporation (Enterprise Security), The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust (DLP), The Saudi Industrial Property Authority, TSO cloud, Visa, Yunnan Power Grid Company
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Security Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Healthcare Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Insurance Company12%
    Computer Software Company12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business61%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is ranked 9th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 29 reviews while Symantec Data Loss Prevention is ranked 3rd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 50 reviews. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is rated 7.4, while Symantec Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention writes "Highly beneficial DLP functionality, full system protection, and useful file scanning". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Data Loss Prevention writes "A lot of false positives have been eliminated, helping with our operational costs". McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Cisco Secure Endpoint, Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention and HP Wolf Security, whereas Symantec Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Zscaler Cloud DLP. See our McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention report.

    See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.