Compare McAfee Web Protection vs. SonicWall CFS

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint, McAfee, TitanHQ and others in Web Content Filtering. Updated: July 2021.
521,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It's a solution that permits making a granular configuration and it is easier to deploy the same configuration on a lot of devices using the central console. It is the master of the product.""The most valuable is the blocking of blacklisted sites, a URL that is, either by intelligence or by McAfee, detected as a malicious site.""It has dependable anti-malware and intrusion prevention features all-in-one package.""The solution does what it's meant to do.""The solution is not too expensive. It's affordable."

More McAfee Web Protection Pros »

"It is very stable."

More SonicWall CFS Pros »

Cons
"The configuration could be simplified because it is more complex to make the configuration on McAfee. What can be improved is the support of the agent on smartphones, IOS or Android. That still now is not available yet.""We used a consultant to help us set it up. Unfortunately, he was not that good. They were out of McAfee people. He was a consultant and knew the product, but he was not a McAfee person. How they managed it and how they worked was not straightforward.""The manufacturerers should have more transparancy about exactly what is getting filtered when you use the product and why.""Lacking filter for spam.""The solution could always use more security features. If it was more secure, it would be an even stronger product."

More McAfee Web Protection Cons »

"Malware, scanning, capture, and integration should be included with the content filtering."

More SonicWall CFS Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing is very reasonable."

More SonicWall CFS Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Filtering solutions are best for your needs.
521,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution is not too expensive. It's affordable.
Top Answer: The solution isn't expensive. It's very reasonably priced. I pay a licensing fee in order to use the product.
Top Answer: I'm not an IT person, and therefore can't speak to if there are any missing features. For me, it works quite well and I have no complaints. The solution could always use more security features. If it… more »
Top Answer: It is very stable.
Top Answer: Licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing is very reasonable.
Top Answer: It has to be able to control more than just web traffic. Malware, scanning, capture, and integration should be included with the content filtering.
Ranking
2nd
Views
2,019
Comparisons
1,396
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
569
Rating
8.6
5th
Views
62
Comparisons
17
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
315
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
McAfee Web Gateway, McAfee SaaS Web Protection
SonicWall Content Filtering Service
Learn More
Overview

McAfee is one of the world’s leading independent cybersecurity companies. Inspired by the power of working together, McAfee creates business and consumer solutions that make the world a safer place. By building solutions that work with other companies' products, McAfee helps businesses orchestrate cyber environments that are truly integrated, where protection, detection, and correction of threats happen simultaneously and collaboratively. By protecting consumers across all their devices, McAfee secures their digital lifestyle at home and away. By working with other security players, McAfee is leading the effort to unite against cybercriminals for the benefit of all.

Paylocity, Rochester School Department

Offer
Learn more about McAfee Web Protection
Learn more about SonicWall CFS
Sample Customers
Sicredi
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider22%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business40%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise50%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint, McAfee, TitanHQ and others in Web Content Filtering. Updated: July 2021.
521,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.

McAfee Web Protection is ranked 2nd in Web Content Filtering with 5 reviews while SonicWall CFS is ranked 5th in Web Content Filtering with 1 review. McAfee Web Protection is rated 8.6, while SonicWall CFS is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of McAfee Web Protection writes "Easily blacklist malicious sites both on premise and on the cloud". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonicWall CFS writes "Reliable content filtering but need more traffic control". McAfee Web Protection is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco Umbrella, Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway, AhnLab V3 Internet Security and Barracuda Web Security Gateway, whereas SonicWall CFS is most compared with Barracuda Web Security Gateway.

See our list of best Web Content Filtering vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Filtering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.