We performed a comparison between McAfee Web Protection [EOL] and Trustwave WebMarshal [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, TitanHQ and others in Internet Security."The product is quite an effective firewall."
"The most valuable feature is the ease in the configuration for security roles."
"The solution is not too expensive. It's affordable."
"It's a solution that permits making a granular configuration and it is easier to deploy the same configuration on a lot of devices using the central console. It is the master of the product."
"It is functional. It has reduced risk and downtime while also ensuring regulatory compliance, which is critical."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it protects against threats that are coming from the web."
"The stability has a good standard right now."
"It doesn't seem to take too much system bandwidth, and I also like its reporting. Once a month, it gives me a reminder of the activity. It reminds me that the protection is on, and if there are any issues, it summarizes those minor issues. During the month, it only notifies when there is something special."
"The setup was fairly straightforward. It's just a proxy."
"In McAfee Web Protection there are gaps in the security design, in the overall architecture, the gaps need to be fixed."
"The solution could always use more security features. If it was more secure, it would be an even stronger product."
"I'm not sure if the solution itself is cloud-based or not. If it isn't they really need to begin to develop that out a bit."
"The solution should be more proactive in regards to sending you updates."
"The initial setup could be simplified, there is a learning curve during the implementation."
"We need a better customer experience and more flexibility in the product."
"Lacking filter for spam."
"The manufacturerers should have more transparancy about exactly what is getting filtered when you use the product and why."
"There's no cloud proxy solution. It's purely on premise, it's a cell inspection, but it doesn't allow any sandboxing. It also doesn't do any tunneling inspection or anything like that."
Earn 20 points
McAfee Web Protection [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Internet Security with 16 reviews while Trustwave WebMarshal [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Internet Security. McAfee Web Protection [EOL] is rated 8.2, while Trustwave WebMarshal [EOL] is rated 3.0. The top reviewer of McAfee Web Protection [EOL] writes "Secure, reasonably priced, and performs well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trustwave WebMarshal [EOL] writes "No support for cloud or large scale". McAfee Web Protection [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Trustwave WebMarshal [EOL] is most compared with .
We monitor all Internet Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.