Compare McKesson HealthQuest vs. McKesson STAR 2000

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
499
Comparisons
379
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
208
Comparisons
165
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
HealthQuestSTAR 2000, McKesson Series 2000
Learn
McKesson
McKesson
Overview
Practice management solution for massage therapists, chiropractors, and practitioners of complementary medicine. For Canadian market.

Healthcare organizations are always looking for tools that will enable them to streamline process and be more efficient. With the McKesson STAR system, healthcare organizations can automate process throughout the entire revenue cycle, enabling them to better manage their daily clinical and financial operations.

The McKesson STAR system allows hospitals to determine patient coverage and their ability to pay for services. The technology also gives healthcare organizations the resources to better understand the true costs of the services they are providing. It enables hospitals and other care providers to access information that they need when negotiating contracts with vendors.

Offer
Learn more about McKesson HealthQuest
Learn more about McKesson STAR 2000
Sample Customers
Blue Cross Blue Shield of South CarolinaEisenhower Medical Center

McKesson HealthQuest is ranked 1st in Hospital Information System while McKesson STAR 2000 is ranked 4th in Hospital Information System. McKesson HealthQuest is rated 0.0, while McKesson STAR 2000 is rated 0.0. On the other hand, McKesson HealthQuest is most compared with Software Associates HIS and McKesson Paragon, whereas McKesson STAR 2000 is most compared with McKesson Paragon.

See our list of best Hospital Information System vendors.

We monitor all Hospital Information System reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.