McKesson HealthQuest vs MediNous comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
McKesson Logo
179 views|136 comparisons
MediNous Logo
28 views|14 comparisons
Ranking
Views
179
Comparisons
136
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
28
Comparisons
14
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
HealthQuest
Learn More
MediNous
Video Not Available
Overview
Practice management solution for massage therapists, chiropractors, and practitioners of complementary medicine. For Canadian market.
Medinous Hospital Information System (HIS) has a multi-tier architecture that is divided into User Interface, Application and (DB) Database. Medinous product architecture is an excellent fit for a distributed environment as it helps get all the related operational information under control-within one system. Distinguished application advantages: Client-Side Execution Capability & Reliability, Engaging Rich Graphical User Interface (RGUI)Robustness and Security of WCF Architecture and Ideal for Distributed Architecture
Sample Customers
Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina
Sharjah's Oldest & Highly Reputed Hospital, Medium Sized Hospital in Mauritius, The Largest Private Hospital in Oman, A Leading Multi-Specialty Medical Centre in Bahrain, One of the Biggest Government Teaching Hospitals in India, A Modern Polyclinic in Kuwait, A Large Polyclinic in Kuala Lumpur

McKesson HealthQuest is ranked 3rd in Hospital Information System while MediNous is ranked 7th in Hospital Information System. McKesson HealthQuest is rated 0.0, while MediNous is rated 0.0. On the other hand, McKesson HealthQuest is most compared with McKesson Paragon and McKesson STAR 2000, whereas MediNous is most compared with .

See our list of best Hospital Information System vendors.

We monitor all Hospital Information System reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.