Compare McKesson HealthQuest vs. Software Associates HIS
McKesson HealthQuest is ranked 1st in Hospital Information System while Software Associates HIS is ranked 3rd in Hospital Information System. McKesson HealthQuest is rated 0, while Software Associates HIS is rated 0. On the other hand, McKesson HealthQuest is most compared with Software Associates HIS, McKesson Paragon and McKesson STAR 2000, whereas Software Associates HIS is most compared with McKesson HealthQuest and McKesson STAR 2000.
Ranking  | |
Views 615 Comparisons 448 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Avg. Rating N/A | Views 321 Comparisons 290 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Avg. Rating N/A |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 55% of the time.  Compared 23% of the time. Compared 15% of the time. | Compared 76% of the time. Compared 24% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| HealthQuest | HIS |
Learn | |
| McKesson | Software Associates |
Overview | |
| Practice management solution for massage therapists, chiropractors, and practitioners of complementary medicine. For Canadian market. | HIS LIS Artificial intelligency medical reports finance management performance management cost analysis user friendly PACS |
Offer | |
Learn more about McKesson HealthQuest | Learn more about Software Associates HIS |
Sample Customers | |
| Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina | Velemegna Eye hospital, Padhar Hospital, Omega Hospital, Sheela Hospital, Saraswathi Hospital, Rathna Memorial Hospital, Jaisee Hospital, Bishop Benziger hospital, BMH Care hospitals, Laxmi hospital, ASTEN Specialty Orthopedic Hospital, Clinix chain of hospitals, Bomu Hospital, Nairobi West Hospital |
See also McKesson HealthQuest Reviews, Software Associates HIS Reviews, and our list of Best Hospital Information System Companies.
We monitor all Hospital Information System reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.