We performed a comparison between MEGA HOPEX and OneTrust GRC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two GRC solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."MEGA offers a more integrated GRC platform to facilitate enhanced coordination between the functions of Risk, Compliance, and Internal Audit on a single platform solution - HOPEX."
"The solution is scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it's completely possible to do so."
"HOPEX has a panel that offers various views. I think that is very good. MEGA has an app for integrating with a lot of apps. We help our clients integrate HOPEX with a different product like Apple Gateway, for example. I've been with the company for 15 years, and we connect with everything. Our clientele includes almost all of the banks in Mexico."
"An advantage is its accessibility."
"The most valuable feature for this solution is the automatic updating and propagation of changes across the system."
"The ability to customize is valuable."
"It is very interactive."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the reuse of common enterprise components and entities."
"One of the valuable features of this solution is it has the ability to review fourth and fifth parties to the nth degree."
"We receive notifications or cases and prioritize them accordingly, which helps us address issues promptly."
"Vendors can be assessed and rated out of the tool, and assessments can be scheduled for updates at certain intervals."
"The product helps us streamline audit and incident management processes."
"OneTrust GRC is stable."
"As a solution for IT risks, it is a very good product."
"It does help in the automation of our privacy impact assessments."
"The interface must be improved."
"The solution lacks additional models compared to other tools."
"Lacking more out of the box integrations."
"I cannot recall coming across any missing features."
"It would be great if this solution could integrate with other tools such as ITSM (ServiceNow) or CMDB."
"The initial setup can be quite complex at first."
"Better documentation and training would be helpful."
"Scalability can be a problem sometimes."
"There are limitations to customized workflow automation, and they need to increase both the available automation and the customized workflow."
"We encounter difficulties creating multiple platforms or interfaces and manual processes for changing certain settings."
"OneTrust GRC's workflows aren't automated and need to be manually driven."
"The Vendor Risk dashboard is quite basic today and not interactive, but improvements are in coming the next releases."
"They could improve by offering free help. A solution, a lot of times, is not just the use of the solution. For example, it is the overall engagement, how well do they support the system, what is their SLA, and how long their response time is to an issue. It would be beneficial if they had some type of professional services where they offer the first five hours of professional services a year for free. That would be a substantial benefit rather than having to buy professional services or professional services packages."
"I haven't seen any return on investment using the solution. If I had the opportunity, I would use a different solution."
"The product is not that easy to set up."
MEGA HOPEX is ranked 4th in GRC with 36 reviews while OneTrust GRC is ranked 5th in GRC with 7 reviews. MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8, while OneTrust GRC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Easy to use and robust with good features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OneTrust GRC writes "Costly solution that may not guarantee ROI, but remains effective in IT risk management ". MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Avolution ABACUS and Visio, whereas OneTrust GRC is most compared with RSA Archer, ProcessUnity, AuditBoard, Workiva Wdesk and LogicGate. See our MEGA HOPEX vs. OneTrust GRC report.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.