We performed a comparison between MEGA HOPEX and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management."The ability to customize is valuable."
"Every module sets up the same information in a unique repository."
"The most valuable feature for this solution is the automatic updating and propagation of changes across the system."
"Its availability is very good."
"You do not need to be a professional of enterprise modeling to contribute to the enrichment and improvement of the enterprise repository."
"What I find the most valuable is the process workflow. It is really good."
"HOPEX has a panel that offers various views. I think that is very good. MEGA has an app for integrating with a lot of apps. We help our clients integrate HOPEX with a different product like Apple Gateway, for example. I've been with the company for 15 years, and we connect with everything. Our clientele includes almost all of the banks in Mexico."
"This is a complete package with all of the functionality that we need."
"Pega BPM's most valuable feature is the use of CDX to solve problems."
"This solution is useful for business process management if you have any banking solutions or need to manage a process."
"The most valuable features are case management and integration services."
"It cuts down the time taken for coding. Earlier it used take for us four hours to do a particular code. Now this can be done in less than 30 minutes. That's the kind of productivity gains you can get."
"While Pega technical support is okay, it also depends on the issues you need help with and who your contact is with Pega."
"Pega BPM's most valuable features are case management, integration, the convenience of using REST APIs, and the ease of changing things at the UI level."
"Can do a lot of things with minimum time and cost."
"The stability has been good. We haven't had any issues."
"Better documentation and training would be helpful."
"We would like to see integration with other products, such as being able to use our workflow with SharePoint and Microsoft Office."
"We have a very close relationship with MEGA representatives in Mexico, and we ask them why they don't offer impact analysis. For example, we have a server in the center and provide the client a view of what's in the peripheral area, like one cluster, application, process area, and services. We want to offer our clients that level of visibility with HOPEX."
"The tool usability is weak and it also has a high learning curve."
"The product must improve integration with other tools."
"In my experience, I've encountered difficulties with consuming custom packages in MEGA HOPEX, which leads to redundant work when deploying them to production. This is an area where improvement is needed. While version six offers better UI and UX, resolving this issue should be a priority. I believe it's important to fully explore MEGA HOPEX's capabilities before suggesting new ones."
"An area for improvement in MEGA HOPEX is its vast learning curve. The tool is also heavy, so that's a pain point. MEGA HOPEX is also tricky to use if you don't train for many hours."
"I cannot recall coming across any missing features."
"The unit testing needs to improve, as well as the user interface."
"Pega Cloud early adoption and use for cross enterprise capability was new to many. The early adoption meant version 2.0 of their cloud service may require refactoring and redesign of some services."
"The cost of licensing could be improved."
"I think there is room for improvement in the low code/ no code environment that they're promoting now. That needs to be aligned a little bit more. I still feel that it is not that friendly for a person who has no experience with Pega to just go in and try to create something."
"I believe they simplify the application development. It is still complex. The learning is not easy, it takes time compared to other products on the market."
"The previous versions had good training documents but the updated versions need to improve the documentation."
"One of the areas of this solution that could be improved would be to advance the low code features of the application itself. We would also like to use the same platform to build any application, even if it is not necessarily defined as a functionality needed by a BPM."
"The initial setup takes time."
MEGA HOPEX is ranked 5th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 36 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 55 reviews. MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Easy to use and robust with good features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Visio and Avolution ABACUS, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
