We performed a comparison between Meraki MS Switches and Ubiquiti Unifi Switches based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Ubiquiti UniFi Switches finish slightly ahead of Meraki MS Switches in this comparison. Ubiquiti provides great flexibility with configurations and has excellent throughput. Some Meraki MS Switches users feel that traffic reporting needs to improve and that the switches can be a bit buggy.
"You can connect from the dashboard itself. It is very easy to operate."
"The initial setup is simple."
"The most valuable features are the cloud management, the monitoring, and the visibility available on the report's facts on the cloud controller."
"It is easy to configure and provides complete visibility of the graphic end point."
"The features are great."
"Meraki's site-to-site VPN function is phenomenal, and the VLAN is simple to use and set up. If you need the VLAN to sort the networks out, that works very well. The performance is also excellent."
"The most valuable feature about Meraki is the console. The second most valuable feature, to me, is the technical support and the infrastructure behind the console."
"They're easy to update."
"I like the control one has with this solution."
"Ubiquiti is one step above the consumer level. They cost a little bit more, but they just seem to be drop-dead reliable, and they're keeping up with the latest standards."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its reliability."
"The ability to manage firmware revisions."
"Good price point and very simple to use."
"It is a high-quality product, and it won't let you down."
"The user interface makes it simple to configure and manage."
"The most valuable feature for us is the VPN."
"This is quite an expensive solution."
"Management from a single dashboard is what I want to see from Meraki MS Switches."
"Meraki should include an application to assist users with the design of access points."
"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The product demonstrates poor price per performance when compared with its competitors."
"It would be great if they can get the price down for small businesses."
"The pricing needs to be more competitive with other products on the market."
"They tend to have some weird issues with fiber uplinks."
"We need to upgrade everything too often."
"The price could be lower."
"Ubiquiti UniFi Switches’s pricing could be less expensive."
"I would like to see the pricing improved."
"I would recommend changing the solution to a recognized one, such as Check Point or Fortinet."
"The routing capabilities of Layer 3 should be made easier to implement."
"Some of the features needed to set up the solution are too complex. There's a lot of technical information that is required."
"The initial deployment was a bit complex."
Meraki MS Switches is ranked 5th in Ethernet Switches with 87 reviews while Ubiquiti UniFi Switches is ranked 3rd in Ethernet Switches with 43 reviews. Meraki MS Switches is rated 8.4, while Ubiquiti UniFi Switches is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Meraki MS Switches writes "They're not expensive and configuration is very easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti UniFi Switches writes "Rock solid stability with adjustable voltage configuration for PoE". Meraki MS Switches is most compared with Aruba Switches, Cisco Ethernet Switches, Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access, NETGEAR Switches and Arista Networks Platform, whereas Ubiquiti UniFi Switches is most compared with Cisco Ethernet Switches, NETGEAR Switches, Aruba Switches, MikroTik Routers and Switches and Luxul Switches. See our Meraki MS Switches vs. Ubiquiti UniFi Switches report.
See our list of best Ethernet Switches vendors.
We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.