Compare Meraki SD-WAN vs. NetFortris Total Control WAN

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Meraki solutions come with a choice of several different subscription options including one year, three years, five years, seven years, and ten years.""The licensing fees are approximately $1,000 USD annually.""The pricing is fair, but if they can make it less it would be even more attractive.""Any license you buy until January 2021 gets you an extra year for that purchase.""like everything else, it's negotiable.""If you purchase a Meeraki box, you have to purchase a license, and it's already the basic license, you will have you SD-WAN included.""This solution is more expensive than competitors."

More Meraki SD-WAN Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Networking (SDN) solutions are best for your needs.
535,544 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: We have found the product to be quite scalable.
Top Answer: This solution is more expensive than competitors.
Top Answer: With Meraki, it's more of a basic connectivity. It doesn't have all the feature sets that a Cisco SD-WAN solution has. It's limited. The product needs to offer connectivity in the major clouds due to… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
7,368
Comparisons
5,824
Reviews
19
Average Words per Review
627
Rating
8.1
Views
27
Comparisons
13
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Software-defined WAN is a new approach to network connectivity that lowers operational costs and improves resource usage for multi-site deployments, allowing network administrators to use bandwidth more efficiently and ensure the highest possible level of performance for critical applications without sacrificing security or data privacy. For more information on deploying and configuring SD-WAN on the Meraki MX Security Appliance, see the Meraki SD-WAN Deployment Guide.

Total Control WAN from NetFortris is a fully managed network solution which aggregates and maximizes all bandwidth resources, regardless of access type and size. Mission critical applications get the priority and QoS they need, and can be adjusted at any time. That means your business operations can leverage connected technology to sell and service your customers, partners and employees better, without compromising security, privacy, or control.

Offer
Learn more about Meraki SD-WAN
Learn more about NetFortris Total Control WAN
Sample Customers
École Jeannine Manuel
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider38%
Educational Organization15%
Financial Services Firm15%
Logistics Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider37%
Computer Software Company22%
Retailer4%
Healthcare Company4%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise33%
No Data Available

Meraki SD-WAN is ranked 1st in Software Defined Networking (SDN) with 22 reviews while NetFortris Total Control WAN is ranked 21st in Software Defined Networking (SDN). Meraki SD-WAN is rated 8.0, while NetFortris Total Control WAN is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Meraki SD-WAN writes "Ultimate flexibility in this solution lends opportunities for creative problem solving and cost savings". On the other hand, Meraki SD-WAN is most compared with VMware SD-WAN, Cisco SD-WAN, Versa FlexVNF, Cradlepoint NetCloud and Prisma SD-WAN, whereas NetFortris Total Control WAN is most compared with .

See our list of best Software Defined Networking (SDN) vendors.

We monitor all Software Defined Networking (SDN) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.