Proofpoint Meta [EOL] vs Safe-T Secure Application Access comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Proofpoint Meta [EOL] and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA as a Service Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In ZTNA as a Service
Views
70
Comparisons
54
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
ZTNA as a Service
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Meta NaaS
Safe-T SDA, Safe-T, Safe-T Software-Defined Access
Learn More
Overview

As applications move to the cloud and workers are increasingly mobile, enterprises need a better alternative for access than traditional VPN. Proofpoint Meta leverages a software-defined perimeter for cloud-delivered secure remote access to resources in the datacenter and the cloud.



Safe-T is a provider of Zero Trust Access solutions which mitigate attacks on enterprises’ business-critical services and sensitive data, while ensuring uninterrupted business continuity. 

Safe-T’s cloud and on-premises solutions ensure that an organization’s access use cases, whether into the organization or from the organization out to the internet, are secured according to the “validate first, access later” philosophy of Zero Trust. 

This means that no one is trusted by default from inside or outside the network, and verification is required from everyone trying to gain access to resources on the network or in the cloud. 

Safe-T’s wide range of access solutions reduce organizations’ attack surface and improve their ability to defend against modern cyberthreats. As an additional layer of security, our integrated business-grade global proxy solution cloud service enables smooth and efficient traffic flow, interruption-free service, unlimited concurrent connections, instant scaling and simple integration with our services. 

With Safe-T’s patented reverse-access technology and proprietary routing technology, organizations of all size and type can secure their data, services and networks against internal and external threats. 

At Safe-T, we empower enterprises to safely migrate to the cloud and enable digital transformation.

Sample Customers
payoneer, allot, via, sapiens, double verify, myheritage, snowball studios, dynamic yield
Government of Israel, eviCore Healthcore, Glen Imaging, Sarin, LBG, Rollomatic, Boegli-Gravures SA, Banque Heritage, Groupe Minoteries, Temenos, ZEK, RLM Finsbury, Harel Insurance, Meitav Dash
Buyer's Guide
ZTNA as a Service
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Proofpoint Meta [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in ZTNA as a Service while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 44th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Proofpoint Meta [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". Proofpoint Meta [EOL] is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Zscaler Private Access, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with .

See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.