Compare Meta NaaS vs. Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter

Meta NaaS is ranked 10th in ZTNA as a Service while Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter is ranked 6th in ZTNA. Meta NaaS is rated 0, while Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter is rated 0. On the other hand, Meta NaaS is most compared with Zscaler Private Access, whereas Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter is most compared with DeepCloud SDP and Verizon Software Defined Perimeter.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
10th
out of 12 in ZTNA as a Service
Views
54
Comparisons
49
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
6th
out of 11 in ZTNA
Views
80
Comparisons
63
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Learn
Meta Networks
Waverley Labs
Video Not Available
Overview

Meta’s Network-as-a-Service enables you to rapidly deploy a zero-trust network security model that protects access from user devices to applications in the data center and the cloud. The first zero-trust enterprise network, Meta NaaS leverages a dense, cloud-native global backbone to deliver segment-of-one application access along with cloud-delivered internet security. For organizations that are updating their network security from a site-centric to Forrester Research's zero-trust delivery model, Meta NaaS provides the security, flexibility and user experience you need.

SDP – provides knowledge of who connected, from where, to what, when etc. in real-time and with far fewer resources than SEIMs require.

Offer
Learn more about Meta NaaS
Learn more about Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter
Sample Customers
payoneer, allot, via, sapiens, double verify, myheritage, snowball studios, dynamic yieldManTech International Corporation
We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.