Compare MetaAccess vs. Sophos Network Access Control

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, ForeScout, Aruba Networks and others in Network Access Control. Updated: March 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control solutions are best for your needs.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The wifi control is fantastic and makes it very easy to administer.
Top Answer: The licensing is modular. That means, you typically buy a base license and then add on what you need to increase its functionality. If you want to, for example, install a main gateway, or if you want… more »
Top Answer: I would like to see mobile administration capabilities in the next release so that we can administer the device from a mobile device.
Ranking
14th
Views
314
Comparisons
111
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
5th
Views
1,577
Comparisons
992
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
506
Rating
8.8
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
OPSWAT MetaAccess
Learn More
Overview

MetaAccess prevents risky devices from accessing local networks and cloud applications such as Office 365, Salesforce and Dropbox. Using OPSWAT’s industry-leading endpoint security and advanced threat prevention technologies, MetaAccess performs extensive security and compliance checks as well as remediation before allowing devices to access corporate data.

Sophos NAC Provides comprehensive, easy-to-deploy network access control that protects enterprise networks from the threats posed by non-compliant, compromised, or misconfigured endpoint computers. The software solution is vendor-neutral and works with existing network infrastructure and security applications. Computers are permitted or denied access to the network, based on a centrally defined, policy-driven assessment - and isolated, quarantined for remediation, automatically remediated, or sent alerts. Administrators can define and manage policies uniquely for managed and guest computers, including checking their security status and ensuring that no unwanted applications are run.
Offer
Learn more about MetaAccess
Learn more about Sophos Network Access Control
Sample Customers
Juniper Networks, Expert Global Solutions (EGS), PCWizrd,
Rushmoor Borough Council
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider30%
Computer Software Company15%
Government11%
Media Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business75%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise13%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, ForeScout, Aruba Networks and others in Network Access Control. Updated: March 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

MetaAccess is ranked 14th in Network Access Control while Sophos Network Access Control is ranked 5th in Network Access Control with 7 reviews. MetaAccess is rated 0.0, while Sophos Network Access Control is rated 8.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Network Access Control writes "Great security with a user-friendly interface and excellent stability". MetaAccess is most compared with ExtremeControl, whereas Sophos Network Access Control is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, ExtremeControl, Fortinet FortiNAC and Ruckus Cloudpath.

See our list of best Network Access Control vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.