Compare MetaDefender Email Security vs. Proofpoint Email Protection

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Proofpoint, Fortinet and others in Email Security. Updated: March 2021.
473,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Licensing costs depend on how many users there are. It could range between $5 and $7 per month, per user.""The license was not per user, the license model was per feature. You could choose anti-virus, anti-spam, etc. It was feature-based and charged yearly.""There were no other costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.""We were using Proofpoint and then we switched to Cisco... reportability was one of the main reasons we switched, but the biggest one was cost. If you can get an equivalent functionality for a better price it's wise to do so. That's what our primary decision came down to: We could get equivalent functionality at a lower price point.""It is not that costly. We pay for the solution through a contractor and pay an annual fee.""You're going to get what you pay for. If you're not willing to pay the price of Cisco, you're not going to get a product that's as good as Cisco. I don't think Cisco is overpriced, because for the last two years I've been comparing it to Microsoft and Cisco has been cheaper and given us more features.""In my previous organization, avoiding four instances of CryptoLocker within an estimated six month period is approximately $600,000 in lost time and effort. Our five year cost was about a million dollars, and the four outages that we had equated to 65 percent of that five year cost.""The licensing was all transferred."

More Cisco Secure Email Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"Annually, it costs us about $92,000. This is pretty much what it costs us. There is no additional cost.""The price is reasonable.""Proofpoint is fairly expensive.""The licensing is basically $8/user."

More Proofpoint Email Protection Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.
473,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I love the Advanced Malware Protection feature. It works very well... The appliance has more security such as SDF, DKIM… more »
Top Answer: The licensing was all transferred. A fair amount of the configuration had to be done by hand. We didn't transfer the… more »
Top Answer: We have been struggling in the last month with Cisco encryption and with the S/MIME encryption. I don't know if it is an… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Proofpoint is the main tool for blocking spam because it denies the connection altogether.
Top Answer: Proofpoint is fairly expensive. Most people, when they go to buy their M365 licenses, they buy them in a bundle. It's… more »
Top Answer: Not one of them is one hundred percent when it comes to reputation scores. It doesn't matter which solution — none of… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco Email Security, IronPort, Cisco Email Security, ESA, Email Security Appliances
OPSWAT MetaDefender Email Security
Proofpoint Enterprise Protection
Learn More
Overview

Customers of all sizes face the same daunting challenge: email is simultaneously the most important business communication tool and the leading attack vector for security breaches. Cisco Email Security enables users to communicate securely and helps organizations combat Business Email Compromise (BEC), ransomware, advanced malware, phishing, spam, and data loss with a multilayered approach to security.

MetaDefender Email Security protects against email borne threats that evade sandboxes and bypass advanced threat protection solutions such as those offered with Office 365 and G Suite. Using industry-leading multi-scanning and data sanitization, also known as content disarm & reconstruction (CDR), MetaDefender Email Security prevents zero-day attacks and unknown threats as well as providing close to 100% known threat detection, without affecting email server performance.

Proofpoint Email Protection stops malware and non-malware threats such as impostor email (also known as email fraud). Deployed as a cloud service or on-premises, it provides granular filtering to control bulk "graymail" and other unwanted email. And business continuity capabilities keep email communications flowing, even when your email server fails.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Secure Email
Learn more about MetaDefender Email Security
Learn more about Proofpoint Email Protection
Sample Customers
SUNY Old Westbury, CoxHealth, City of Fullerton, Indra
Leader Communications Incorporated (LCI)
Blocket, University of Waterloo, Lincoln Memorial University, WellSpan Health, U-Haul, Carestream Health, Westinghouse
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company21%
Retailer16%
Manufacturing Company11%
Financial Services Firm11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider33%
Computer Software Company21%
Financial Services Firm5%
Government4%
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm6%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise42%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise42%
Large Enterprise54%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise40%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Proofpoint, Fortinet and others in Email Security. Updated: March 2021.
473,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.

MetaDefender Email Security is ranked 32nd in Email Security while Proofpoint Email Protection is ranked 2nd in Email Security with 10 reviews. MetaDefender Email Security is rated 0.0, while Proofpoint Email Protection is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Proofpoint Email Protection writes "Flexible, very secure, and offers excellent technical support". MetaDefender Email Security is most compared with Forcepoint Email Security, whereas Proofpoint Email Protection is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection, Fortinet FortiMail, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 and Agari.

See our list of best Email Security vendors.

We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.