• Home
  • MicroPact vs. OpenText MBPM

MicroPact vs OpenText MBPM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MicroPact Logo

MicroPact

217 views|76 comparisons
OpenText Logo

OpenText MBPM

Read 2 OpenText MBPM reviews
443 views|259 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between MicroPact and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use MicroPact?
Jaideep MS
A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "There is an annual license to use OpenText MBPM."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution."

    • More OpenText MBPM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText MBPM?
    Top Answer:On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What needs improvement with OpenText MBPM?
    Top Answer:There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part. However, support is a major area that needs improvement. In general, the technical documentation isn't available to start with… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for OpenText MBPM?
    Top Answer:We use OpenText MBPM for business process management and vendor invoice management. There are a lot of other variations as well. So we don't just use it for automation. Primarily, we get information… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    Ranking
    55th
    out of 93 in Business Process Management (BPM)
    Views
    217
    Comparisons
    76
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    41st
    out of 93 in Business Process Management (BPM)
    Views
    443
    Comparisons
    259
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Metastorm BPM
    Learn More
    MicroPact
    Video Not Available
    OpenText
    Overview

    For nearly four decades, MicroPact has focused on engineering web-based, commercial off the shelf (COTS) solutions for US Government agencies and Fortune 500 corporations. Today MicroPact solutions serve 97% of federal agencies with 500 or more employees, 98% of U.S. state governments, and enjoy a 97% annual renewal rate.

    MicroPact has one focus: to provide customers with the best experience through the most efficient technology from the most talented people in the world. We facilitate transformation by being a disruptor —­ by putting control and transformational power in the hands of our customers in the form of open architecture, open standard, platform independent case management and BPM technology. 

    OpenText's MBPM (formerly Metastorm BPM) delivers the insight, power and agility you need to make your vision for business improvement a reality.
    Sample Customers
    Department of Defense, Department of Justice, General Services Administration, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Internal Revenue Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Veterans Affairs, Norfolk Southern, CSX, The University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Georgia State University, University of Texas, East Carolina University
    Kommunales Rechenzentrum Minden-Ravensburg/Lippe (KRZ), Hawksford Group, Gauteng Provincial Government Department of Economic Development, Deutsche Post DHL, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, London Underground, Great Clips, Fiat, Rompetrol, Gaston Memorial Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Bachmann, Alliance Healthcare
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Government16%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Insurance Company10%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Management (BPM)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    MicroPact is ranked 55th in Business Process Management (BPM) while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. MicroPact is rated 0.0, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". MicroPact is most compared with , whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.