We performed a comparison between OpenText MBPM and Oracle BPEL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."
"The product has everything we need."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."
"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."
OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while Oracle BPEL is ranked 16th in Process Automation with 2 reviews. OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0, while Oracle BPEL is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPEL writes "A highly scalable solution that provides various features for the execution of business processes". OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda, whereas Oracle BPEL is most compared with Camunda, BizTalk Server and Bonita.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.