We performed a comparison between OpenText MBPM and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
Earn 20 points
OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Business Process Management (BPM). OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
