We performed a comparison between OpenText MBPM and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"The product supports various types of digital documents, including XMLs and EDI."
"The messaging part is the most valuable feature."
"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"The solution's ease-of-use is its most valuable feature, in which complex issues may be resolved."
"Most of the work in our organization can be more easily done using the tool."
"webMethods platform is used to build an EAI platform, enabling communication between many internal systems and third-party operators."
"What I found most valuable in webMethods Integration Server is that it's a strong ESB. It also has strong API modules and portals."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."
"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."
"The product must add more compatible connectors."
"A while ago, they were hacked, and it took them a very long time to open their website again in order to download any service packs or any features. I don't know what they could do differently. I know that they were vulnerable, and there was some downtime, but because they were down, we were unable to download any potential service packs."
"As webMethods Integration Server is expensive, that's its area for improvement."
"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics."
"In terms of scale, I would give it a four out of 10."
"The learning curve is a little steep at first."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.