Metastorm M3 [EOL] vs OpenText ProVision comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
views| comparisons
OpenText Logo
251 views|163 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Metastorm M3 [EOL] and OpenText ProVision based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design.
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Design Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Metastorm M3 [EOL]?
Anonymous User
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information.
Top Answer:OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use. In the next release, OpenText ProVision should combine intelligence capability with process modeling.
Ranking
Unranked
In Business Process Design
Views
251
Comparisons
163
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
197
Rating
5.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Metastorm ProVision
Learn More
Overview
Information Not Available
OpenText’s MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes
Sample Customers
Johnson Controls Inc., Applied Materials, UPMC, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Sharp Healthcare
Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Energy/Utilities Company16%
Financial Services Firm15%
Computer Software Company12%
Government8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise70%
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Design
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design. Updated: April 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Metastorm M3 [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Business Process Design while OpenText ProVision is ranked 35th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews. Metastorm M3 [EOL] is rated 0.0, while OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". Metastorm M3 [EOL] is most compared with MID Innovator, whereas OpenText ProVision is most compared with Visio, ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.