OpenText ProVision vs QualiWare X comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText ProVision and QualiWare X based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Architecture Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Gavin Bérubé
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"All the features come as part of a standard license.""OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information.""The stability of the product is very good."

More OpenText ProVision Pros →

"I like the solution's traceability."

More QualiWare X Pros →

Cons
"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments.""OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use.""Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."

More OpenText ProVision Cons →

"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."

More QualiWare X Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive."
  • More QualiWare X Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information.
    Top Answer:OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use. In the next release, OpenText ProVision should combine intelligence capability with process modeling.
    Top Answer:I like the solution's traceability.
    Top Answer:I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive.
    Top Answer:The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling.
    Ranking
    Views
    223
    Comparisons
    147
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    197
    Rating
    5.0
    Views
    386
    Comparisons
    235
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    223
    Rating
    6.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Metastorm ProVision
    Learn More
    Overview
    OpenText’s MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes
    QualiWare enables positive change by providing tools and methods that ensure coherency, consensus and consistency, and we support the agile and innovative company in handling complex knowledge, maintained by multiple persons with different backgrounds, in a continuous process.
    Sample Customers
    Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration
    Emiliambiente, OLI, Galletti, Hiref, Bugatti, Argelli, Culligan Italiana, Sal, Stefal Cablaggi, BrainBee Automotive, Varvel, Campagnola, Favini, G.F., Gruppo ROLD
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Energy/Utilities Company16%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government32%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Media Company7%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Architecture Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText ProVision is ranked 24th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 3 reviews while QualiWare X is ranked 23rd in Enterprise Architecture Management with 3 reviews. OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4, while QualiWare X is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QualiWare X writes "Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive ". OpenText ProVision is most compared with Visio, SAP Signavio Process Manager, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and ARIS BPA, whereas QualiWare X is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, iServer, ARIS Cloud and Avolution ABACUS.

    See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.