OpenText ProVision vs Salamander MooD Active Enterprise comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText ProVision and Salamander MooD Active Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Use Salamander MooD Active Enterprise?
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information.
Top Answer:OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use. In the next release, OpenText ProVision should combine intelligence capability with process modeling.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
251
Comparisons
163
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
197
Rating
5.0
27th
Views
84
Comparisons
67
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Metastorm ProVision
MooD Active Enterprise
Learn More
Salamander
Video Not Available
Overview
OpenText’s MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes
MooD Active Enterprise is a server-side product for deploying and managing configured solutions across a wide community of users. The product exploits standard enterprise web technologies to provide highly visual and compelling support to complex end-to-end decision processes.Users understand, assess and act on actual and potential business activity, performance and outcomes.
Sample Customers
Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration
PFA, HP, Datapoint, Ministry of Defence
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Energy/Utilities Company16%
Financial Services Firm15%
Computer Software Company12%
Government8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText ProVision is ranked 35th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while Salamander MooD Active Enterprise is ranked 27th in Business Process Design. OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4, while Salamander MooD Active Enterprise is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". On the other hand, OpenText ProVision is most compared with Visio, ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, whereas Salamander MooD Active Enterprise is most compared with .

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.