We performed a comparison between OpenText ProVision and Visio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."
"All the features come as part of a standard license."
"The stability of the product is very good."
"We are all familiar with it, and it is easy to use. There is a lot of flexibility, and you can add shapes if you want."
"The most valuable feature is how easy it is to use."
"It's very agile and user friendly with a lot of templates."
"Visio is a very easy tool in general, making it easy for anyone to understand."
"It keeps track of its connections as you move things around."
"The solution makes it very easy to make exciting pictures and designs. Everything is very intuitive and simple to figure out."
"Visio is easy to use."
"The primary functionality revolves around the creation of flow diagrams and diverse Building Information Modeling (BIM) using contemporary and pre-established notations. In my perspective, these ready-made notations prove highly beneficial. Despite being a compact tool, it is effective for tasks such as drawing organizational charts, making it a straightforward and uncomplicated tool."
"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."
"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."
"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."
"Layout configuration is sometimes a little difficult to use."
"I would like to see traceability. It doesn't have it. You cannot find one object amongst several sheets of Visio diagrams."
"From my perspective, Visio could probably add more help guidelines for users, and I would prefer to see more intuitive user interfaces to help with dragging and dropping, using the right components, etc."
"The user interface could be simplified and easier to use."
"It is not flexible in terms of functions and modeling deliverables. When you speak of processes, the program has to describe the activities and the deliverables. You have to tell your robots how to deal with and input something, and you should have something more flexible from this point of view."
"The solution should have better integration capabilities with MacOS and Linux."
"The application could be lighter or it could be faster with documents."
"It should be easier to transition into a new version without having to spend so much time in just one area."
OpenText ProVision is ranked 35th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while Visio is ranked 1st in Business Process Design with 101 reviews. OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4, while Visio is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visio writes "A software for drawing a variety of diagrams which include flowcharts, org charts, building plans, floor plans, data flow diagrams". OpenText ProVision is most compared with ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, whereas Visio is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Bizagi, Visual Paradigm, IBM Blueworks Live and SAP Signavio Process Manager.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.